TY - JOUR
T1 - Timing of multivessel revascularization in stable patients with STEMI
T2 - a systematic review and network meta-analysis
AU - Voll, Felix
AU - Kuna, Constantin
AU - Scalamogna, Maria
AU - Kessler, Thorsten
AU - Kufner, Sebastian
AU - Rheude, Tobias
AU - Sager, Hendrik B.
AU - Xhepa, Erion
AU - Wiebe, Jens
AU - Joner, Michael
AU - Byrne, Robert A.
AU - Schunkert, Heribert
AU - Ndrepepa, Gjin
AU - Stähli, Barbara E.
AU - Kastrati, Adnan
AU - Cassese, Salvatore
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Sociedad Española de Cardiología
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Introduction and objectives: Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) is recommended in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) without cardiogenic shock. The present network meta-analysis investigated the optimal timing of MV-PCI in this context. Methods: We pooled the aggregated data from randomized trials investigating stable STEMI patients with multivessel CAD treated with a strategy of either MV-PCI or culprit vessel-only PCI. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The main secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. Results: Among 11 trials, a total of 10 507 patients were randomly assigned to MV-PCI (same sitting, n = 1683; staged during the index hospitalization, n = 3460; staged during a subsequent hospitalization within 45 days, n = 3275) or to culprit vessel-only PCI (n = 2089). The median follow-up was 18.6 months. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, MV-PCI staged during the index hospitalization significantly reduced all-cause death (risk ratio, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.92; P = .008) and ranked as possibly the best treatment option for this outcome compared with all other strategies. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, a MV-PCI reduced cardiovascular mortality without differences dependent on the timing of revascularization. MV-PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, significantly reduced myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, with no significant difference between each other. Conclusions: In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD without cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, represents the safest and most efficacious approach. The different timings of multivessel PCI did not result in any significant differences in all-cause death. This study is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023457794).
AB - Introduction and objectives: Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) is recommended in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) without cardiogenic shock. The present network meta-analysis investigated the optimal timing of MV-PCI in this context. Methods: We pooled the aggregated data from randomized trials investigating stable STEMI patients with multivessel CAD treated with a strategy of either MV-PCI or culprit vessel-only PCI. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The main secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. Results: Among 11 trials, a total of 10 507 patients were randomly assigned to MV-PCI (same sitting, n = 1683; staged during the index hospitalization, n = 3460; staged during a subsequent hospitalization within 45 days, n = 3275) or to culprit vessel-only PCI (n = 2089). The median follow-up was 18.6 months. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, MV-PCI staged during the index hospitalization significantly reduced all-cause death (risk ratio, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.92; P = .008) and ranked as possibly the best treatment option for this outcome compared with all other strategies. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, a MV-PCI reduced cardiovascular mortality without differences dependent on the timing of revascularization. MV-PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, significantly reduced myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, with no significant difference between each other. Conclusions: In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD without cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, represents the safest and most efficacious approach. The different timings of multivessel PCI did not result in any significant differences in all-cause death. This study is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023457794).
KW - Coronary artery disease
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Multivessel
KW - Myocardial infarction
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203083062&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.recesp.2024.06.002
DO - 10.1016/j.recesp.2024.06.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 38936467
AN - SCOPUS:85203083062
SN - 0300-8932
VL - 78
SP - 127
EP - 137
JO - Revista Espanola de Cardiologia
JF - Revista Espanola de Cardiologia
IS - 2
ER -