Timing of multivessel revascularization in stable patients with STEMI: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Felix Voll, Constantin Kuna, Maria Scalamogna, Thorsten Kessler, Sebastian Kufner, Tobias Rheude, Hendrik B. Sager, Erion Xhepa, Jens Wiebe, Michael Joner, Robert A. Byrne, Heribert Schunkert, Gjin Ndrepepa, Barbara E. Stähli, Adnan Kastrati, Salvatore Cassese

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI) is recommended in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) without cardiogenic shock. The present network meta-analysis investigated the optimal timing of MV-PCI in this context. Methods: We pooled the aggregated data from randomized trials investigating stable STEMI patients with multivessel CAD treated with a strategy of either MV-PCI or culprit vessel-only PCI. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The main secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. Results: Among 11 trials, a total of 10 507 patients were randomly assigned to MV-PCI (same sitting, n = 1683; staged during the index hospitalization, n = 3460; staged during a subsequent hospitalization within 45 days, n = 3275) or to culprit vessel-only PCI (n = 2089). The median follow-up was 18.6 months. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, MV-PCI staged during the index hospitalization significantly reduced all-cause death (risk ratio, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.56-0.92; P = .008) and ranked as possibly the best treatment option for this outcome compared with all other strategies. In comparison with culprit vessel-only PCI, a MV-PCI reduced cardiovascular mortality without differences dependent on the timing of revascularization. MV-PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, significantly reduced myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, with no significant difference between each other. Conclusions: In patients with STEMI and multivessel CAD without cardiogenic shock, multivessel PCI within the index hospitalization, either in a single procedure or staged, represents the safest and most efficacious approach. The different timings of multivessel PCI did not result in any significant differences in all-cause death. This study is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023457794).

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)127-137
Seitenumfang11
FachzeitschriftRevista Espanola de Cardiologia
Jahrgang78
Ausgabenummer2
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Feb. 2025

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Timing of multivessel revascularization in stable patients with STEMI: a systematic review and network meta-analysis“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren