TY - JOUR
T1 - Thermo-Economic Evaluation of Novel Flexible CAES/CCPP Concept
AU - Herrmann, Stephan
AU - Kahlert, Steffen
AU - Wuerth, Manuel
AU - Spliethoff, Hartmut
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 by ASME.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - This paper presents the results of a thermodynamic and economic evaluation of a novel hybrid combination of a compressed air energy storage (CAES) and a combined cycle power plant (CCPP). The new cycle is modeled on the basis of a GE LM6000 gas turbine model, an adiabatic compressor model, an air expander, and a conventional dual-pressure heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) configuration. Furthermore, a detailed design of the recuperator is presented. With the simulated components, a storage efficiency of 60% is reached. In combined heat and power (CHP) configuration, the total efficiency of the plant reaches up to 86.2%. The thermodynamic and economic performance is compared to a conventional LM6000 combined cycle. For the economic evaluation, the German electricity day-ahead prices and average gas price of the year 2014 are used. Overall, it is found that the CAES/CCPP concept exhibits far more operation hours per year and a higher profit margin than the compared CCPP. Taking into account the investment and operational costs, especially with steam extraction, the net present value (NPV) of the novel cycle is higher than that of the combined cycle, despite the challenging market environment for storage technologies in Germany.
AB - This paper presents the results of a thermodynamic and economic evaluation of a novel hybrid combination of a compressed air energy storage (CAES) and a combined cycle power plant (CCPP). The new cycle is modeled on the basis of a GE LM6000 gas turbine model, an adiabatic compressor model, an air expander, and a conventional dual-pressure heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) configuration. Furthermore, a detailed design of the recuperator is presented. With the simulated components, a storage efficiency of 60% is reached. In combined heat and power (CHP) configuration, the total efficiency of the plant reaches up to 86.2%. The thermodynamic and economic performance is compared to a conventional LM6000 combined cycle. For the economic evaluation, the German electricity day-ahead prices and average gas price of the year 2014 are used. Overall, it is found that the CAES/CCPP concept exhibits far more operation hours per year and a higher profit margin than the compared CCPP. Taking into account the investment and operational costs, especially with steam extraction, the net present value (NPV) of the novel cycle is higher than that of the combined cycle, despite the challenging market environment for storage technologies in Germany.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051390993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/1.4035424
DO - 10.1115/1.4035424
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85051390993
SN - 0195-0738
VL - 139
JO - Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME
JF - Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME
IS - 1
M1 - 011902
ER -