TY - JOUR
T1 - The Zero Heat Flux Method and Sweat Loss Modeling in Sports
T2 - 11th conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, ISEA 2016
AU - Janta, Marius
AU - Höschele, Nadja
AU - Senner, Veit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Today professional and amateur endurance athletes commonly use biofeedback systems to monitor their training and competition pace. Body core temperature and sweat loss are crucial factors influencing physical capabilities. Unfortunately, current gold standards are invasive and therefore impractical in active situations. Several non-intrusive technologies or models have been proposed, but partially are still unsuitable for active applications, not user friendly or lack knowledge on physiological relations. This paper is a first attempt for new information systems in sports and primarily assesses the Zero Heat Flux Method (ZHF) compared to aural temperatures during activity in two environments and four body sites. Furthermore, sweat loss has been analysed in various controlled experiments presented as simple modelling approach. Results showed that during activity in this set up, optimally 66% of differences in the zero heat flux method were within common core temperature deviations of ±0.5 °C. Deviations varied highly across sites, the two conditions and individuals. The same is reflected from relations between body core temperature and sweat loss, since correlation coefficients increase with a more detailed subgrouping. In conclusion, it seems that slight modifications on the sensor assembly e.g. on insulation and size could partially solve remaining deviations. On contrast it's likely that skin wetness remains a problem. Due to manifold individual and environmental influences on sweat rate, insufficient technologies and impracticable models, it remains unclear how sweat loss could be reliably measured or predicted. From today's knowledge a further attempt could be using local sweat composition as predictor of blood sodium levels that potentially could describe hypo-and even hyper-hydration.
AB - Today professional and amateur endurance athletes commonly use biofeedback systems to monitor their training and competition pace. Body core temperature and sweat loss are crucial factors influencing physical capabilities. Unfortunately, current gold standards are invasive and therefore impractical in active situations. Several non-intrusive technologies or models have been proposed, but partially are still unsuitable for active applications, not user friendly or lack knowledge on physiological relations. This paper is a first attempt for new information systems in sports and primarily assesses the Zero Heat Flux Method (ZHF) compared to aural temperatures during activity in two environments and four body sites. Furthermore, sweat loss has been analysed in various controlled experiments presented as simple modelling approach. Results showed that during activity in this set up, optimally 66% of differences in the zero heat flux method were within common core temperature deviations of ±0.5 °C. Deviations varied highly across sites, the two conditions and individuals. The same is reflected from relations between body core temperature and sweat loss, since correlation coefficients increase with a more detailed subgrouping. In conclusion, it seems that slight modifications on the sensor assembly e.g. on insulation and size could partially solve remaining deviations. On contrast it's likely that skin wetness remains a problem. Due to manifold individual and environmental influences on sweat rate, insufficient technologies and impracticable models, it remains unclear how sweat loss could be reliably measured or predicted. From today's knowledge a further attempt could be using local sweat composition as predictor of blood sodium levels that potentially could describe hypo-and even hyper-hydration.
KW - Human Modeling
KW - Monitoring
KW - Thermal Stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982948294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.262
DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.262
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:84982948294
SN - 1877-7058
VL - 147
SP - 643
EP - 648
JO - Procedia Engineering
JF - Procedia Engineering
Y2 - 11 July 2016 through 14 July 2016
ER -