Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

The Stiffness Comparison Test: A pilot study to determine inter-individual differences in palpatory skill related to gender, age, and occupation-related experience

  • Katja Martina Bartsch
  • , Robert Schleip
  • , Alberto Zullo
  • , Kerstin Hoppe
  • , Werner Klingler
  • Verein zur Förderung der Faszienforschung e.V.
  • Friedrich-Alexander Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg (FAU)
  • Universität Ulm
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena
  • Diploma University of Applied Sciences
  • Technische Universität München
  • Università degli Studi del Sannio
  • Johann Wolfgang Goethe University
  • SRH Hospital
  • Queensland University of Technology

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

5 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Manual palpation is a core skill in physical examination. Assessing elastic properties such as tissue stiffness has the potential for being an important diagnostics tool in the detection of cancer and other diseases. Objective: The study describes the newly developed Stiffness Comparison Test (SCT). The aim of our study was to test the SCT as a tool to detect interindividual differences in palpation skill related to gender, age and occupational experience. Methods: We used eight pairs of polyuterhane gel pads with the stiffness difference decreasing from the first to the last pair. Test subjects were asked to palpate each pair and determine stiffness differences. Participants: We recruited 25 osteopaths, 48 other manual therapists and 50 participants from other non-manual professions. Results: As hypothesized there was no significant difference in SCT performance between the sexes (t(121) = 0.288, p = .774). To investigate if an age-related decline would have an effect on palpation skill, we carried out a linear regression. As hypothesized, the model did not predict any significant associations (F(1, 121) = 2.733, b = −0.149, p = .101, R2 = 0.022). To compare the effect of occupational groups on SCT performance a one-way ANOVA was conducted. There were no statistically significant differences between group means (F(2, 120) = 0.598, p = .552). Conclusions: The SCT can be used as simple and affordable tool for assessment, teaching and training in all disciplines of manual medicine. Further refinements of the tool are suggested to advance its discrimination power.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1-6
Seitenumfang6
FachzeitschriftJournal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Jahrgang24
Ausgabenummer4
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Okt. 2020

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „The Stiffness Comparison Test: A pilot study to determine inter-individual differences in palpatory skill related to gender, age, and occupation-related experience“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren