TY - JOUR
T1 - Technical tips during implantation of selective upper airway stimulation
AU - Heiser, Clemens
AU - Thaler, Erica
AU - Soose, Ryan J.
AU - Woodson, B. Tucker
AU - Boon, Maurits
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Objective: Selective upper airway stimulation is now well-established in the United States and in several European countries, with more than 1,000 patients implanted since U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in April 2014. The authors herein, all head and neck surgeons, account for approximately one of every five implants completed to date. Several of the authors also provide comprehensive longitudinal care of their patients as dual-specialty sleep medicine physicians. Study Design: Multi-center, retrospective clinical analysis. Methods: More than 300 implants have been evaluated and reviewed in five different implant centers (Germany, United States). Results: This analysis shares tips and techniques from the collective experiences with more than 300 implants, which can help newer implanters learn vicariously both for standard practices in executing routine implants through activation and, importantly, for working through more challenging encounters with anatomy, special patient phenotypes, system testing, and troubleshooting. Conclusion: These tips should help new implanters handle most of the situations arising during implantation and avoid common pitfalls. Laryngoscope, 128:756–762, 2018.
AB - Objective: Selective upper airway stimulation is now well-established in the United States and in several European countries, with more than 1,000 patients implanted since U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in April 2014. The authors herein, all head and neck surgeons, account for approximately one of every five implants completed to date. Several of the authors also provide comprehensive longitudinal care of their patients as dual-specialty sleep medicine physicians. Study Design: Multi-center, retrospective clinical analysis. Methods: More than 300 implants have been evaluated and reviewed in five different implant centers (Germany, United States). Results: This analysis shares tips and techniques from the collective experiences with more than 300 implants, which can help newer implanters learn vicariously both for standard practices in executing routine implants through activation and, importantly, for working through more challenging encounters with anatomy, special patient phenotypes, system testing, and troubleshooting. Conclusion: These tips should help new implanters handle most of the situations arising during implantation and avoid common pitfalls. Laryngoscope, 128:756–762, 2018.
KW - Obstructive sleep apnea
KW - hypoglossal nerve stimulation
KW - selective upper airway stimulation
KW - sleep medicine
KW - surgical treatment obstructive sleep apnea
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021811711&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/lary.26724
DO - 10.1002/lary.26724
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28681961
AN - SCOPUS:85021811711
SN - 0023-852X
VL - 128
SP - 756
EP - 762
JO - Laryngoscope
JF - Laryngoscope
IS - 3
ER -