TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic Review of Guidelines for the Management of Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
AU - Abbott, Anne L.
AU - Paraskevas, Kosmas I.
AU - Kakkos, Stavros K.
AU - Golledge, Jonathan
AU - Eckstein, Hans Henning
AU - Diaz-Sandoval, Larry J.
AU - Cao, Longxing
AU - Fu, Qiang
AU - Wijeratne, Tissa
AU - Leung, Thomas W.
AU - Montero-Baker, Miguel
AU - Lee, Byung Chul
AU - Pircher, Sabine
AU - Bosch, Marije
AU - Dennekamp, Martine
AU - Ringleb, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.
PY - 2015/11/1
Y1 - 2015/11/1
N2 - Background and Purpose-We systematically compared and appraised contemporary guidelines on management of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Methods-We systematically searched for guideline recommendations on carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid angioplasty/stenting (CAS) published in any language between January 1, 2008, and January 28, 2015. Only the latest guideline per writing group was selected. Each guideline was analyzed independently by 2 to 6 authors to determine clinical scenarios covered, recommendations given, and scientific evidence used. Results-Thirty-four eligible guidelines were identified from 23 different regions/countries in 6 languages. Of 28 guidelines with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis procedural recommendations, 24 (86%) endorsed CEA (recommended it should or may be provided) for ≈50% to 99% average-surgical-risk asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, 17 (61%) endorsed CAS, 8 (29%) opposed CAS, and 1 (4%) endorsed medical treatment alone. For asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis patients considered high-CEA-risk because of comorbidities, vascular anatomy, or undefined reasons, CAS was endorsed in 13 guidelines (46%). Thirty-one of 33 guidelines (94%) with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis procedural recommendations endorsed CEA for patients with ≈50% to 99% average-CEA-risk symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, 19 (58%) endorsed CAS and 9 (27%) opposed CAS. For high-CEA-risk symptomatic carotid artery stenosis because of comorbidities, vascular anatomy, or undefined reasons, CAS was endorsed in 27 guidelines (82%). Guideline procedural recommendations were based only on results of trials in which patients were randomized 12 to 34 years ago, rarely reflected medical treatment improvements and often understated potential CAS hazards. Qualifying terminology summarizing recommendations or evidence lacked standardization, impeding guideline interpretation, and comparison. Conclusions-This systematic review has identified many opportunities to modernize and otherwise improve carotid stenosis management guidelines.
AB - Background and Purpose-We systematically compared and appraised contemporary guidelines on management of asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Methods-We systematically searched for guideline recommendations on carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid angioplasty/stenting (CAS) published in any language between January 1, 2008, and January 28, 2015. Only the latest guideline per writing group was selected. Each guideline was analyzed independently by 2 to 6 authors to determine clinical scenarios covered, recommendations given, and scientific evidence used. Results-Thirty-four eligible guidelines were identified from 23 different regions/countries in 6 languages. Of 28 guidelines with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis procedural recommendations, 24 (86%) endorsed CEA (recommended it should or may be provided) for ≈50% to 99% average-surgical-risk asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, 17 (61%) endorsed CAS, 8 (29%) opposed CAS, and 1 (4%) endorsed medical treatment alone. For asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis patients considered high-CEA-risk because of comorbidities, vascular anatomy, or undefined reasons, CAS was endorsed in 13 guidelines (46%). Thirty-one of 33 guidelines (94%) with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis procedural recommendations endorsed CEA for patients with ≈50% to 99% average-CEA-risk symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, 19 (58%) endorsed CAS and 9 (27%) opposed CAS. For high-CEA-risk symptomatic carotid artery stenosis because of comorbidities, vascular anatomy, or undefined reasons, CAS was endorsed in 27 guidelines (82%). Guideline procedural recommendations were based only on results of trials in which patients were randomized 12 to 34 years ago, rarely reflected medical treatment improvements and often understated potential CAS hazards. Qualifying terminology summarizing recommendations or evidence lacked standardization, impeding guideline interpretation, and comparison. Conclusions-This systematic review has identified many opportunities to modernize and otherwise improve carotid stenosis management guidelines.
KW - carotid endarterectomy
KW - carotid guideline
KW - carotid stenosis
KW - carotid stenting
KW - stroke prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945893039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.003390
DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.003390
M3 - Article
C2 - 26451020
AN - SCOPUS:84945893039
SN - 0039-2499
VL - 46
SP - 3288
EP - 3301
JO - Stroke
JF - Stroke
IS - 11
ER -