TY - GEN
T1 - Snoring -An Acoustic Definition
AU - Janott, Christoph
AU - Rohrmeier, Christian
AU - Schmitt, Maximilian
AU - Hemmert, Werner
AU - Schuller, Bjorn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IEEE.
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - Objective The distinction of snoring and loud breathing is often subjective and lies in the ear of the beholder. The aim of this study is to identify and assess acoustic features with a high suitability to distinguish these two classes of sound, in order to facilitate an objective definition of snoring based on acoustic parameters.Methods A corpus of snore and breath sounds from 23 subjects has been used that were classified by 25 human raters. Using the openSMILE feature extractor, 6 373 acoustic features have been evaluated for their selectivity comparing SVM classification, logistic regression, and the recall of each single feature.Results Most selective single features were several statistical functionals of the first and second mel frequency spectrum-generated perceptual linear predictive (PLP) cepstral coefficient with an unweighted average recall (UAR) of up to 93.8%. The best performing feature sets were low level descriptors (LLDs), derivatives and statistical functionals based on fast Fourier transformation (FFT), with a UAR of 93.0%, and on the summed mel frequency spectrum-generated PLP cepstral coefficients, with a UAR of 92.2% using SVM classification. Compared to SVM classification, logistic regression did not show considerable differences in classification performance.Conclusion It could be shown that snoring and loud breathing can be distinguished by robust acoustic features. The findings might serve as a guidance to find a consensus for an objective definition of snoring compared to loud breathing.
AB - Objective The distinction of snoring and loud breathing is often subjective and lies in the ear of the beholder. The aim of this study is to identify and assess acoustic features with a high suitability to distinguish these two classes of sound, in order to facilitate an objective definition of snoring based on acoustic parameters.Methods A corpus of snore and breath sounds from 23 subjects has been used that were classified by 25 human raters. Using the openSMILE feature extractor, 6 373 acoustic features have been evaluated for their selectivity comparing SVM classification, logistic regression, and the recall of each single feature.Results Most selective single features were several statistical functionals of the first and second mel frequency spectrum-generated perceptual linear predictive (PLP) cepstral coefficient with an unweighted average recall (UAR) of up to 93.8%. The best performing feature sets were low level descriptors (LLDs), derivatives and statistical functionals based on fast Fourier transformation (FFT), with a UAR of 93.0%, and on the summed mel frequency spectrum-generated PLP cepstral coefficients, with a UAR of 92.2% using SVM classification. Compared to SVM classification, logistic regression did not show considerable differences in classification performance.Conclusion It could be shown that snoring and loud breathing can be distinguished by robust acoustic features. The findings might serve as a guidance to find a consensus for an objective definition of snoring compared to loud breathing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077845594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856615
DO - 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856615
M3 - Conference contribution
C2 - 31946668
AN - SCOPUS:85077845594
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS
SP - 3653
EP - 3657
BT - 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2019
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2019
Y2 - 23 July 2019 through 27 July 2019
ER -