TY - JOUR
T1 - SIGNIFICANCE of TRAUMATIC MACROAMPUTATION in SEVERELY INJURED PATIENTS
T2 - AN ANALYSIS of the TRAUMAREGISTER DGUA
AU - Delhey, Patrick
AU - Huber, Stephan
AU - Hanschen, Marc
AU - Häberle, Sandra
AU - Trentzsch, Heiko
AU - Deiler, Stephan
AU - Van Griensven, Martijn
AU - Biberthaler, Peter
AU - Lefering, Rolf
AU - Huber-Wagner, Stefan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 by the Shock Society.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Treatment of patients with traumatic macroamputations is challenging. The aim of this study is to analyze the significance of this type of injury in TraumaRegister DGUA (TR-DGU) and to depict the rate of formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation, epidemiologic data, as well as outcome in severely injured patients with amputations. We acquired data from the TR-DGU of the German Trauma Society (DGU). The inclusion criteria for our study were Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 9, macroamputation, and available data about the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) code. A total of 48,908 of 67,425 patients had an ISS greater than 9 and available data about the AIS code. In total, 926 (1.9%) of 48,908 patients had an immediate traumatic macroamputation on-scene. Thereof, 298 patients (32.2%) had a macroamputation of the arms, 605 patients (65.3%) had an amputation of the legs, and 23 patients (2.5%) had both. Among them, 457 patients (49.4%) with a macroamputation had monotrauma. In total, 126 patients (13.6%) underwent replantation and 800 patients (86.4%) underwent formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation. Seventy-six (23.7%) of 321 patients with upperextremity amputations and 53 (8.4%) of 628 patients with lower-extremity amputations underwent replantation. Mortality in patients with replantation was lower (5.6% vs. 19.6%, P < 0.001). Standardized mortality rate was lower for patients with replantation (0.71, 95% confidence interval, 0.20Y1.21 vs. 0.94, 95% confidence interval, 0.80Y1.10; P = 0.26). Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was significantly better for patients with replantation (34.0%; GOS score 5) as compared with patients without replantation (20.7%; GOS score 5; P < 0.001). In borderline patients (defined according to the orthopedic damage control principles), 91.5% received formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation and 8.5% underwent replantation. The rate of formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation is higher when principles of damage control surgery are applied. The replantation rate in the upper extremity is higher than in the lower extremity. The less ISS and base excess and the higher blood pressure, hemoglobin value, and thromboplastin time are, the safer the decision for replantation seems to be.
AB - Treatment of patients with traumatic macroamputations is challenging. The aim of this study is to analyze the significance of this type of injury in TraumaRegister DGUA (TR-DGU) and to depict the rate of formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation, epidemiologic data, as well as outcome in severely injured patients with amputations. We acquired data from the TR-DGU of the German Trauma Society (DGU). The inclusion criteria for our study were Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 9, macroamputation, and available data about the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) code. A total of 48,908 of 67,425 patients had an ISS greater than 9 and available data about the AIS code. In total, 926 (1.9%) of 48,908 patients had an immediate traumatic macroamputation on-scene. Thereof, 298 patients (32.2%) had a macroamputation of the arms, 605 patients (65.3%) had an amputation of the legs, and 23 patients (2.5%) had both. Among them, 457 patients (49.4%) with a macroamputation had monotrauma. In total, 126 patients (13.6%) underwent replantation and 800 patients (86.4%) underwent formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation. Seventy-six (23.7%) of 321 patients with upperextremity amputations and 53 (8.4%) of 628 patients with lower-extremity amputations underwent replantation. Mortality in patients with replantation was lower (5.6% vs. 19.6%, P < 0.001). Standardized mortality rate was lower for patients with replantation (0.71, 95% confidence interval, 0.20Y1.21 vs. 0.94, 95% confidence interval, 0.80Y1.10; P = 0.26). Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was significantly better for patients with replantation (34.0%; GOS score 5) as compared with patients without replantation (20.7%; GOS score 5; P < 0.001). In borderline patients (defined according to the orthopedic damage control principles), 91.5% received formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation and 8.5% underwent replantation. The rate of formal surgical ablation of the traumatically induced amputation is higher when principles of damage control surgery are applied. The replantation rate in the upper extremity is higher than in the lower extremity. The less ISS and base excess and the higher blood pressure, hemoglobin value, and thromboplastin time are, the safer the decision for replantation seems to be.
KW - Amputation
KW - Emergency medicine
KW - Macroamputation
KW - Major trauma
KW - Outcome
KW - Polytrauma; multiple trauma
KW - Replantation
KW - Resuscitation
KW - Severely injured
KW - Shock
KW - Survival
KW - Trauma
KW - Trauma room
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937868859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000292
DO - 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000292
M3 - Article
C2 - 25514430
AN - SCOPUS:84937868859
SN - 1073-2322
VL - 43
SP - 233
EP - 237
JO - Shock
JF - Shock
IS - 3
ER -