TY - JOUR
T1 - Serum tumor markers for response prediction and monitoring of advanced lung cancer
T2 - A review focusing on immunotherapy and targeted therapies
AU - Van Den Heuvel, Michel
AU - Holdenrieder, Stefan
AU - Schuurbiers, Milou
AU - Cigoianu, Daniel
AU - Trulson, Inga
AU - Van Rossum, Huub
AU - Lang, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 - The authors. Published by IOS Press.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - BACKGROUND: The value of serum tumor markers (STMs) in the current therapeutic landscape of lung cancer is unclear. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review gathered evidence of the predictive, prognostic, and monitoring value of STMs for patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy (IT) or targeted therapy (TT). METHODS: Literature searches were conducted (cut-off: May 2022) using PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Medical professionals advised on the search strategies. RESULTS: Study heterogeneity limited the evidence and inferences from the 36 publications reviewed. While increased baseline levels of serum cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen (CYFRA21-1) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) may predict IT response, results for TT were less clear. For monitoring IT-treated patients, STM panels (including CYFRA21-1, CEA, and neuron-specific enolase) may surpass the power of single analyses to predict non-response. CYFRA21-1 measurement could aid in monitoring TT-treated patients, but the value of CEA in this context requires further investigation. Overall, baseline and dynamic changes in individual or combined STM levels have potential utility to predict treatment outcome and for monitoring of patients with advanced lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced lung cancer, STMs provide additional relevant clinical information by predicting treatment outcome, but further standardization and validation is warranted.
AB - BACKGROUND: The value of serum tumor markers (STMs) in the current therapeutic landscape of lung cancer is unclear. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review gathered evidence of the predictive, prognostic, and monitoring value of STMs for patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy (IT) or targeted therapy (TT). METHODS: Literature searches were conducted (cut-off: May 2022) using PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Medical professionals advised on the search strategies. RESULTS: Study heterogeneity limited the evidence and inferences from the 36 publications reviewed. While increased baseline levels of serum cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen (CYFRA21-1) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) may predict IT response, results for TT were less clear. For monitoring IT-treated patients, STM panels (including CYFRA21-1, CEA, and neuron-specific enolase) may surpass the power of single analyses to predict non-response. CYFRA21-1 measurement could aid in monitoring TT-treated patients, but the value of CEA in this context requires further investigation. Overall, baseline and dynamic changes in individual or combined STM levels have potential utility to predict treatment outcome and for monitoring of patients with advanced lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced lung cancer, STMs provide additional relevant clinical information by predicting treatment outcome, but further standardization and validation is warranted.
KW - STMs
KW - immunotherapy
KW - non-small cell lung cancer
KW - small cell lung cancer
KW - targeted therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188760704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3233/TUB-220039
DO - 10.3233/TUB-220039
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37248927
AN - SCOPUS:85188760704
SN - 1010-4283
VL - 46
SP - S233-S268
JO - Tumor Biology
JF - Tumor Biology
IS - s1
ER -