TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
T2 - A clinical comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone single bundle versus semitendinosus and gracilis double bundle technique
AU - Sadoghi, Patrick
AU - Müller, Peter E.
AU - Jansson, Volkmar
AU - Van Griensven, Martin
AU - Kröpfl, Albert
AU - Fischmeister, Martin F.
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - The study hypothesis was that the outcome of semitendinosus gracilis double bundle (STG-DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is advantageous in terms of clinical results and restoration of anterior-posterior and rotational laxity in comparison to bone-patellar tendon-bone single-bundle (PTB-SB) ACL reconstruction. We analysed 41 PTB-SB and 51 STG-DB patients using the Tegner, IKDC and WOMAC scores preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of two years. At follow-up, there was no significant difference in the clinical scores. The KT 1000 side-to-side measurement showed no significant difference between groups. The STG-DB group was significantly superior in terms of the pivot-shift sign and anterior knee pain. We conclude that the outcome of STG-DB reconstruction in the mid-term was not advantageous in terms of clinical scores and anterior-posterior laxity evaluated by the KT 1000. Nevertheless, the restored rotational laxity measured by the pivot shift test was significantly superior in the STG-DB technique.
AB - The study hypothesis was that the outcome of semitendinosus gracilis double bundle (STG-DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is advantageous in terms of clinical results and restoration of anterior-posterior and rotational laxity in comparison to bone-patellar tendon-bone single-bundle (PTB-SB) ACL reconstruction. We analysed 41 PTB-SB and 51 STG-DB patients using the Tegner, IKDC and WOMAC scores preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of two years. At follow-up, there was no significant difference in the clinical scores. The KT 1000 side-to-side measurement showed no significant difference between groups. The STG-DB group was significantly superior in terms of the pivot-shift sign and anterior knee pain. We conclude that the outcome of STG-DB reconstruction in the mid-term was not advantageous in terms of clinical scores and anterior-posterior laxity evaluated by the KT 1000. Nevertheless, the restored rotational laxity measured by the pivot shift test was significantly superior in the STG-DB technique.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79751528060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00264-010-1037-1
DO - 10.1007/s00264-010-1037-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 20442994
AN - SCOPUS:79751528060
SN - 0341-2695
VL - 35
SP - 127
EP - 133
JO - International Orthopaedics
JF - International Orthopaedics
IS - 1
ER -