TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative valuation of platform technology based entrepreneurial ventures
AU - Achleitner, Ann Kristin
AU - Lutz, Eva
AU - Schraml, Stephanie
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - In the course of raising external equity, e.g., from venture capitalists, a quantitative valuation is usually required for entrepreneurial ventures. This paper examines the challenges of quantitatively valuing platform technology based entrepreneurial ventures. The distinct characteristics of such companies pose specific requirements on the applicability of quantitative valuation methods. The entrepreneur can choose from a wide range of potential commercialisation strategies to pursue in the course of company development which is difficult to take account of in a quantitative valuation. By developing and applying a systematic map of valuation requirements in this context, we analyse whether the cost, market, discounted cash flow (DCF) or real option approach is suitable for platform technology based entrepreneurial ventures. We argue that all three valuation methods have drawbacks. Yet, the DCF approach is considered to be more suitable for the entrepreneur as well as external equity providers than other quantitative valuation methods.
AB - In the course of raising external equity, e.g., from venture capitalists, a quantitative valuation is usually required for entrepreneurial ventures. This paper examines the challenges of quantitatively valuing platform technology based entrepreneurial ventures. The distinct characteristics of such companies pose specific requirements on the applicability of quantitative valuation methods. The entrepreneur can choose from a wide range of potential commercialisation strategies to pursue in the course of company development which is difficult to take account of in a quantitative valuation. By developing and applying a systematic map of valuation requirements in this context, we analyse whether the cost, market, discounted cash flow (DCF) or real option approach is suitable for platform technology based entrepreneurial ventures. We argue that all three valuation methods have drawbacks. Yet, the DCF approach is considered to be more suitable for the entrepreneur as well as external equity providers than other quantitative valuation methods.
KW - IP
KW - commercialisation strategies
KW - entrepreneurial venture
KW - intangible assets
KW - intellectual property
KW - platform technology
KW - quantitative company valuation
KW - value extraction
KW - young venture valuation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865746307&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1504/IJEV.2010.032537
DO - 10.1504/IJEV.2010.032537
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84865746307
SN - 1742-5360
VL - 1
SP - 352
EP - 366
JO - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing
JF - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing
IS - 4
ER -