TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary Results of Patients with Genitourinary Malignancies Presented at a Molecular Tumor Board
AU - Michaelis, Jakob
AU - Himmelsbach, Ruth
AU - Metzger, Patrick
AU - Lassmann, Silke
AU - Börries, Melanie
AU - Werner, Martin
AU - Miething, Cornelius
AU - Höfflin, Rouven
AU - Illert, Anna L.
AU - Duyster, Justus
AU - Becker, Heiko
AU - Sigle, August
AU - Gratzke, Christian
AU - Grabbert, Markus
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.
PY - 2024/10/1
Y1 - 2024/10/1
N2 - Introduction: Personalized medicine poses great opportunities and challenges. While the therapeutic landscape markedly expands, descriptions about status, clinical implementation and real-world benefits of precision oncology andmolecular tumor boards (MTB) remain sparse, particularly in the field of genitourinary (GU) cancer. Hence, this study characterized urological MTB cases to better understand the potential role of MTB in uro-oncology. Methods: We analyzed patients with complete data sets being reviewed at an MTB from January 2019 to October 2022, focusing on results of molecular analysis and treatment recommendations. Results: We evaluated 102 patients with GU cancer with a mean patient age of 61.7 years. Prostate cancer (PCa) was the most frequent entity with 52.9% (54/102), followed by bladder cancer (18.6%, 19/102) and renal cell carcinoma (14.7%, 15/ 102). On average, case presentation at MTB took place 54.9 months after initial diagnosis and after 2.7 previous lines of therapy. During the study period, 49.0% (50/102) of patients deceased. Additional MTB-based treatment recommendations were achieved in a majority of 68.6% (70/102) of patients, with a recommendation for targeted therapy in 64.3% (45/70) of these patients. Only 6.7% (3/45) of patients - due to different reasons - received the recommended MTB-based therapy though, with 33% (1/3) of patients reaching disease control. Throughout the MTB study period, GU cancer case presentations and treatment recommendations increased, while the time interval between initial presentation and final therapy recommendation were decreasing over time. Conclusion: Presentation of urooncological patients at the MTB is a highly valuable measure for clinical decision-making. Prospectively, earlier presentation of patients at the MTB and changing legislative issues regarding comprehensive molecular testing and targeted treatment approval might further improve patients' benefits from comprehensive molecular diagnostics.
AB - Introduction: Personalized medicine poses great opportunities and challenges. While the therapeutic landscape markedly expands, descriptions about status, clinical implementation and real-world benefits of precision oncology andmolecular tumor boards (MTB) remain sparse, particularly in the field of genitourinary (GU) cancer. Hence, this study characterized urological MTB cases to better understand the potential role of MTB in uro-oncology. Methods: We analyzed patients with complete data sets being reviewed at an MTB from January 2019 to October 2022, focusing on results of molecular analysis and treatment recommendations. Results: We evaluated 102 patients with GU cancer with a mean patient age of 61.7 years. Prostate cancer (PCa) was the most frequent entity with 52.9% (54/102), followed by bladder cancer (18.6%, 19/102) and renal cell carcinoma (14.7%, 15/ 102). On average, case presentation at MTB took place 54.9 months after initial diagnosis and after 2.7 previous lines of therapy. During the study period, 49.0% (50/102) of patients deceased. Additional MTB-based treatment recommendations were achieved in a majority of 68.6% (70/102) of patients, with a recommendation for targeted therapy in 64.3% (45/70) of these patients. Only 6.7% (3/45) of patients - due to different reasons - received the recommended MTB-based therapy though, with 33% (1/3) of patients reaching disease control. Throughout the MTB study period, GU cancer case presentations and treatment recommendations increased, while the time interval between initial presentation and final therapy recommendation were decreasing over time. Conclusion: Presentation of urooncological patients at the MTB is a highly valuable measure for clinical decision-making. Prospectively, earlier presentation of patients at the MTB and changing legislative issues regarding comprehensive molecular testing and targeted treatment approval might further improve patients' benefits from comprehensive molecular diagnostics.
KW - Molecular tumor board
KW - Personalized medicine
KW - Precision oncology
KW - Targeted therapy
KW - Urological oncology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196757173&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000538908
DO - 10.1159/000538908
M3 - Article
C2 - 38626735
AN - SCOPUS:85196757173
SN - 0042-1138
VL - 108
SP - 383
EP - 391
JO - Urologia Internationalis
JF - Urologia Internationalis
IS - 5
ER -