Abstract
The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the influence of the class-I antiarrhythmic drugs prajmaline and propafenone. 58 patients with high-grade symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias and underlying heart disease were given the two drugs in a randomized and placebo-controlled acute oral testing. Prajmaline and propafenone showed a comparable efficacy with 50% and 55%, respectively. Aggravation, calculated following the 'Munchner Modell', was noted in 5% of the patients using placebo, and in 7% when one of the two antiarrhythmic drugs had been administered. Side effects were significantly more frequent under both drugs than under placebo: prajmaline 19%, propafenone 22%.
| Titel in Übersetzung | Prajmaline and propafenone. Efficacy, aggravations, side effects in acute oral testing |
|---|---|
| Originalsprache | Deutsch |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 24-27 |
| Seitenumfang | 4 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Herz Kreislauf |
| Jahrgang | 24 |
| Ausgabenummer | 1 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 1992 |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „PRAJMALIN UND PROPAFENON. EFFEKTIVITAT, AGGRAVIERUNGEN, NEBENWIRKUNGEN IM ORALEN AKUTTEST“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Dieses zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver