PRAJMALIN UND PROPAFENON. EFFEKTIVITAT, AGGRAVIERUNGEN, NEBENWIRKUNGEN IM ORALEN AKUTTEST

M. Hofmann, L. Goedel-Meinen, G. Schmidt, G. Jahns, P. Barthel, W. Maier-Rudolph, W. Baedeker, H. Blomer

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

1 Zitat (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the influence of the class-I antiarrhythmic drugs prajmaline and propafenone. 58 patients with high-grade symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias and underlying heart disease were given the two drugs in a randomized and placebo-controlled acute oral testing. Prajmaline and propafenone showed a comparable efficacy with 50% and 55%, respectively. Aggravation, calculated following the 'Munchner Modell', was noted in 5% of the patients using placebo, and in 7% when one of the two antiarrhythmic drugs had been administered. Side effects were significantly more frequent under both drugs than under placebo: prajmaline 19%, propafenone 22%.

Titel in ÜbersetzungPrajmaline and propafenone. Efficacy, aggravations, side effects in acute oral testing
OriginalspracheDeutsch
Seiten (von - bis)24-27
Seitenumfang4
FachzeitschriftHerz Kreislauf
Jahrgang24
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1992
Extern publiziertJa

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „PRAJMALIN UND PROPAFENON. EFFEKTIVITAT, AGGRAVIERUNGEN, NEBENWIRKUNGEN IM ORALEN AKUTTEST“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren