TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany
T2 - A pre-post trial
AU - Scheibler, Fülöp
AU - Geiger, Friedemann
AU - Wehkamp, Kai
AU - Danner, Marion
AU - Debrouwere, Marie
AU - Stolz-Klingenberg, Constanze
AU - Schuldt-Joswig, Anja
AU - Sommer, Christina Gesine
AU - Kopeleva, Olga
AU - Bünzen, Claudia
AU - Wagner-Ullrich, Christine
AU - Koch, Gerhard
AU - Coors, Marie
AU - Wehking, Felix
AU - Clayman, Marla
AU - Weymayr, Christian
AU - Sundmacher, Leonie
AU - Rüffer, Jens Ulrich
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/10/27
Y1 - 2023/10/27
N2 - Objectives To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the SHARE TO CARE (S2C) programme, a complex intervention designed for hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making (SDM). Design Pre-post study. Setting University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel Campus. Participants Healthcare professionals as well as inpatients and outpatients from 22 departments of the Kiel Campus of UKSH. Interventions The S2C programme is a comprehensive implementation strategy including four core modules: (1) physician training, (2) SDM support training for and support by nurses as decision coaches, (3) patient activation and (4) evidence-based patient decision aid development and integration into patient pathways. After full implementation, departments received the S2C certificate. Main outcome measures In this paper, we report on the feasibility and effectiveness outcomes of the implementation. Feasibility was judged by the degree of implementation of the four modules of the programme. Outcome measures for effectiveness are patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The primary outcome measure for effectiveness is the Patient Decision Making subscale of the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS PDM). Pre-post comparisons were done using t-Tests. Results The implementation of the four components of the S2C programme was able to be completed in 18 of the 22 included departments within the time frame of the study. After completion of implementation, PICS PDM showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.01) between the means compared with baseline. This difference corresponds to a small to medium yet clinically meaningful positive effect (Hedges' g=0.2). Consistent with this, the secondary PREMs (Preparation for Decision Making and collaboRATE) also showed statistically significant, clinically meaningful positive effects. Conclusions The hospital-wide implementation of SDM with the S2C-programme proved to be feasible and effective within the time frame of the project. The German Federal Joint Committee has recommended to make the Kiel model of SDM a national standard of care.
AB - Objectives To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the SHARE TO CARE (S2C) programme, a complex intervention designed for hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making (SDM). Design Pre-post study. Setting University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel Campus. Participants Healthcare professionals as well as inpatients and outpatients from 22 departments of the Kiel Campus of UKSH. Interventions The S2C programme is a comprehensive implementation strategy including four core modules: (1) physician training, (2) SDM support training for and support by nurses as decision coaches, (3) patient activation and (4) evidence-based patient decision aid development and integration into patient pathways. After full implementation, departments received the S2C certificate. Main outcome measures In this paper, we report on the feasibility and effectiveness outcomes of the implementation. Feasibility was judged by the degree of implementation of the four modules of the programme. Outcome measures for effectiveness are patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The primary outcome measure for effectiveness is the Patient Decision Making subscale of the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS PDM). Pre-post comparisons were done using t-Tests. Results The implementation of the four components of the S2C programme was able to be completed in 18 of the 22 included departments within the time frame of the study. After completion of implementation, PICS PDM showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.01) between the means compared with baseline. This difference corresponds to a small to medium yet clinically meaningful positive effect (Hedges' g=0.2). Consistent with this, the secondary PREMs (Preparation for Decision Making and collaboRATE) also showed statistically significant, clinically meaningful positive effects. Conclusions The hospital-wide implementation of SDM with the S2C-programme proved to be feasible and effective within the time frame of the project. The German Federal Joint Committee has recommended to make the Kiel model of SDM a national standard of care.
KW - Clinical Decision-Making
KW - EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175856732&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462
DO - 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462
M3 - Article
C2 - 37890982
AN - SCOPUS:85175856732
SN - 2515-446X
VL - 29
SP - 87
EP - 95
JO - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
JF - BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
IS - 2
ER -