TY - JOUR
T1 - Operating EC-based Electrolytes with Li-and Mn-Rich NCMs
T2 - The Role of O2-Release on the Choice of the Cyclic Carbonate
AU - Teufl, Tobias
AU - Pritzl, Daniel
AU - Krieg, Patrick
AU - Strehle, Benjamin
AU - Mendez, Manuel A.
AU - Gasteiger, Hubert A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published on behalf of The Electrochemical Society by IOP Publishing Limited.
PY - 2020/1/8
Y1 - 2020/1/8
N2 - Li-and Mn-rich layered oxides are a promising class of cathode active materials (CAMs) for future lithium-ion batteries. However, they suffer from fast capacity fading in standard EC-containing electrolytes, and therefore fluorinated alternatives, such as FEC, are required to improve their full-cell performance, which unfortunately increases the cost of the electrolyte. In this study, we will analyze the reasons for the poor cycling performance of EC-containing electrolytes with CAMs that release lattice oxygen at high degrees of delithiation, i.e., either of Li-and Mn-rich NCMs (LMRNCMs) during activation or of NCMs at high cutoff voltages. By on-line electrochemical mass spectrometry (OEMS), we will show that the stability of EC towards electrochemical oxidation is sufficient up to potentials of ≈4.7 V vs Li+/Li, but that its chemical reaction with lattice oxygen released from CAMs negatively affects cycle-life. Furthermore, we will show that the use of EC-based electrolytes above the onset potential for oxygen release leads to a resistance build-up causing a rapid "rollover"fading, while FEC does not show such a dramatic impedance increase. Last, we will demonstrate that the lattice oxygen release from NCM-622 above ≈4.5 V vs Li+/Li requires the use of EC-free electrolytes for stable cycling.
AB - Li-and Mn-rich layered oxides are a promising class of cathode active materials (CAMs) for future lithium-ion batteries. However, they suffer from fast capacity fading in standard EC-containing electrolytes, and therefore fluorinated alternatives, such as FEC, are required to improve their full-cell performance, which unfortunately increases the cost of the electrolyte. In this study, we will analyze the reasons for the poor cycling performance of EC-containing electrolytes with CAMs that release lattice oxygen at high degrees of delithiation, i.e., either of Li-and Mn-rich NCMs (LMRNCMs) during activation or of NCMs at high cutoff voltages. By on-line electrochemical mass spectrometry (OEMS), we will show that the stability of EC towards electrochemical oxidation is sufficient up to potentials of ≈4.7 V vs Li+/Li, but that its chemical reaction with lattice oxygen released from CAMs negatively affects cycle-life. Furthermore, we will show that the use of EC-based electrolytes above the onset potential for oxygen release leads to a resistance build-up causing a rapid "rollover"fading, while FEC does not show such a dramatic impedance increase. Last, we will demonstrate that the lattice oxygen release from NCM-622 above ≈4.5 V vs Li+/Li requires the use of EC-free electrolytes for stable cycling.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088482803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9e7f
DO - 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9e7f
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088482803
SN - 0013-4651
VL - 167
JO - Journal of the Electrochemical Society
JF - Journal of the Electrochemical Society
IS - 11
M1 - 110505
ER -