TY - GEN
T1 - Objectification methods for ride comfort
T2 - 9th VDI / VDE symposium on Control technology for automated driving and networked mobility, AUTOREG 2019
AU - Enders, E.
AU - Fent, F.
AU - Lienkamp, M.
AU - Burkhard, G.
AU - Schramm, D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, VDI Verlag GMBH. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - For efficient suspension development, objective performance indicators are needed which quantify the system with regard to ride comfort. This paper aims to investigate the capabilities of objectification methods from literature and presents a new method for automated and autonomous driving situations. Two studies were conducted in order to investigate objectification methods for ride comfort. In the first study, different objectification methods from literature were tested and compared. Sixteen subjects drove on a country road with a BMW 650i (F06). The subjects had to rate different damper settings which were tested at the same road section. The sensor data was evaluated according to ISO-2631:1997 [29] (equal to VDI- 2057:2017 [69]), BS 6841:1987 [7], as well as according to the methods of Rericha [60], Cucuz [13], Klingner [32] and Hennecke [28]. As subjective ratings imply ordinally scaled data sets, the correlation between the objective values and the subjective ratings is tested with the rank-correlation coefficient Kendalls-Tau and exploratory statistical methods. In the second study, forty participants drove and were driven around country roads in a BMW 135i (F20). The inattentive occupants had to perform an activity on a tablet which distracted them from the current driving situation. The subjects had to rate the ride comfort on four different road sections. Measurements have been conducted with a self-developed body measurement system and a seat pad sensor according to ISO-10326 [30]. The measurements and subjective ratings were correlated and statistically analyzed. The results of the first study show that the ISO-2631 [29], VDI-2057 and BS6841:1987 [7] perform best under the given test conditions. The method of Klingner [32] shows the best results of the non-standardized methods. The results of the second study show a significant difference in comfort perception between attentive and inattentive occupants. It can also be seen that inattentive occupants show higher values of RMS accelerations measured at the head, which is also visible in the vehicle to head transmissibility.
AB - For efficient suspension development, objective performance indicators are needed which quantify the system with regard to ride comfort. This paper aims to investigate the capabilities of objectification methods from literature and presents a new method for automated and autonomous driving situations. Two studies were conducted in order to investigate objectification methods for ride comfort. In the first study, different objectification methods from literature were tested and compared. Sixteen subjects drove on a country road with a BMW 650i (F06). The subjects had to rate different damper settings which were tested at the same road section. The sensor data was evaluated according to ISO-2631:1997 [29] (equal to VDI- 2057:2017 [69]), BS 6841:1987 [7], as well as according to the methods of Rericha [60], Cucuz [13], Klingner [32] and Hennecke [28]. As subjective ratings imply ordinally scaled data sets, the correlation between the objective values and the subjective ratings is tested with the rank-correlation coefficient Kendalls-Tau and exploratory statistical methods. In the second study, forty participants drove and were driven around country roads in a BMW 135i (F20). The inattentive occupants had to perform an activity on a tablet which distracted them from the current driving situation. The subjects had to rate the ride comfort on four different road sections. Measurements have been conducted with a self-developed body measurement system and a seat pad sensor according to ISO-10326 [30]. The measurements and subjective ratings were correlated and statistically analyzed. The results of the first study show that the ISO-2631 [29], VDI-2057 and BS6841:1987 [7] perform best under the given test conditions. The method of Klingner [32] shows the best results of the non-standardized methods. The results of the second study show a significant difference in comfort perception between attentive and inattentive occupants. It can also be seen that inattentive occupants show higher values of RMS accelerations measured at the head, which is also visible in the vehicle to head transmissibility.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105884690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85105884690
SN - 9783180923390
SN - 9783180923406
SN - 9783180923413
SN - 9783180923420
SN - 9783180923437
SN - 9783180923451
SN - 9783180923468
SN - 9783180923475
SN - 9783180923482
SN - 9783180923499
SN - 9783180923505
SN - 9783180923512
SN - 9783180923529
SN - 9783180923536
SN - 9783180923543
SN - 9783180923567
SN - 9783180923574
SN - 9783180923581
SN - 9783180923598
SN - 9783180923604
SN - 9783180923611
SN - 9783180923628
SN - 9783180923635
SN - 9783180923642
SN - 9783180923659
SN - 9783180923666
T3 - VDI Berichte
SP - 323
EP - 350
BT - VDI Berichte
PB - VDI Verlag GMBH
Y2 - 2 July 2019 through 3 July 2019
ER -