More Than Six Elements per Wavelength: The Practical Use of Structural Finite Element Models and Their Accuracy in Comparison with Experimental Results

P. Langer, M. Maeder, C. Guist, M. Krause, S. Marburg

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

77 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Choosing the right number and type of elements in modern commercial finite element tools is a challenging task. It requires a broad knowledge about the theory behind or much experience by the user. Benchmark tests are a common method to prove the element performance against analytical solutions. However, these tests often analyze the performance only for single elements. When investigating the complete mesh of an arbitrary structure, the comparison of the element's performance is quite challenging due to the lack of closed or fully converged solutions. The purpose of this paper is to show a high-precision comparison of eigenfrequencies of a real structure between experimental and numerical results in the context of an element performance check with respect to a converged solution. Additionally, the authors identify the practically relevant accuracy of simulation and experiment. Finally, the influence of accuracy with respect to the number of elements per standing structural bending wave is shown.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer1750025
FachzeitschriftJournal of Computational Acoustics
Jahrgang25
Ausgabenummer4
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Dez. 2017

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „More Than Six Elements per Wavelength: The Practical Use of Structural Finite Element Models and Their Accuracy in Comparison with Experimental Results“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren