Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography

Ulrich Güldener, Thorsten Kessler, Moritz von Scheidt, Johann S. Hawe, Beatrix Gerhard, Dieter Maier, Mark Lachmann, Karl Ludwig Laugwitz, Salvatore Cassese, Albert W. Schömig, Adnan Kastrati, Heribert Schunkert

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

5 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Machine learning (ML) approaches have the potential to uncover regular patterns in multi-layered data. Here we applied self-organizing maps (SOMs) to detect such patterns with the aim to better predict in-stent restenosis (ISR) at surveillance angiography 6 to 8 months after percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting. Methods: In prospectively collected data from 10,004 patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for 15,004 lesions, we applied SOMs to predict ISR angiographically 6–8 months after index procedure. SOM findings were compared with results of conventional uni- and multivariate analyses. The predictive value of both approaches was assessed after random splitting of patients into training and test sets (50:50). Results: Conventional multivariate analyses revealed 10, mostly known, predictors for restenosis after coronary stenting: balloon-to-vessel ratio, complex lesion morphology, diabetes mellitus, left main stenting, stent type (bare metal vs. first vs. second generation drug eluting stent), stent length, stenosis severity, vessel size reduction, and prior bypass surgery. The SOM approach identified all these and nine further predictors, including chronic vessel occlusion, lesion length, and prior PCI. Moreover, the SOM-based model performed well in predicting ISR (AUC under ROC: 0.728); however, there was no meaningful advantage in predicting ISR at surveillance angiography in comparison with the conventional multivariable model (0.726, p = 0.3). Conclusions: The agnostic SOM-based approach identified—without clinical knowledge—even more contributors to restenosis risk. In fact, SOMs applied to a large prospectively sampled cohort identified several novel predictors of restenosis after PCI. However, as compared with established covariates, ML technologies did not improve identification of patients at high risk for restenosis after PCI in a clinically relevant fashion.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer2941
FachzeitschriftJournal of Clinical Medicine
Jahrgang12
Ausgabenummer8
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Apr. 2023

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren