TY - JOUR
T1 - Living labs—a concept for co-designing nature-base solutions
AU - Lupp, Gerd
AU - Zingraff-Hamed, Aude
AU - Huang, Josh J.
AU - Oen, Amy
AU - Pauleit, Stephan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Living Labs are recognized as a progressive form to foster innovation and the strength-ening of collaborative planning. The concept has received strong attention by the European Union (EU) research and innovation agendas recently. This contribution investigates how a Living Lab approach could be used for the design and implementation of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS). NBS are gaining acceptance as a more sustainable solution for reducing the exposure to natural hazards and vulnerability to events, such as increased flooding in changing climate. However, a lack of collaborative approaches hinders their broader implementation. A literature review on the theoretical aspects of the Living Labs concept in the context of NBS is conducted, and we compare the theoretical findings with practices that were observed by case studies implementing NBS in a collaborative manner. The Isar-Plan River Restoration in Munich, Germany, and the Mountain Forest Initiative (Bergwaldoffensive). Both of the case studies have already started well before the concept of Living Labs gained wider popularity. Both award-winning cases are recognized good practice for their exemplary in-depth stakeholder involvement. The paper discusses the concepts and approaches of Living Labs and reflects on how it can serve and support in-depth participatory stakeholder involvement.
AB - Living Labs are recognized as a progressive form to foster innovation and the strength-ening of collaborative planning. The concept has received strong attention by the European Union (EU) research and innovation agendas recently. This contribution investigates how a Living Lab approach could be used for the design and implementation of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS). NBS are gaining acceptance as a more sustainable solution for reducing the exposure to natural hazards and vulnerability to events, such as increased flooding in changing climate. However, a lack of collaborative approaches hinders their broader implementation. A literature review on the theoretical aspects of the Living Labs concept in the context of NBS is conducted, and we compare the theoretical findings with practices that were observed by case studies implementing NBS in a collaborative manner. The Isar-Plan River Restoration in Munich, Germany, and the Mountain Forest Initiative (Bergwaldoffensive). Both of the case studies have already started well before the concept of Living Labs gained wider popularity. Both award-winning cases are recognized good practice for their exemplary in-depth stakeholder involvement. The paper discusses the concepts and approaches of Living Labs and reflects on how it can serve and support in-depth participatory stakeholder involvement.
KW - Blue Solutions
KW - Collaborative planning
KW - Cooperative planning
KW - Green Solutions
KW - Hydro-meteorological risks
KW - Innovation design
KW - Living Labs
KW - Natural hazard mitigation
KW - Nature-Based Solutions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098549430&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/su13010188
DO - 10.3390/su13010188
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098549430
SN - 2071-1050
VL - 13
SP - 1
EP - 22
JO - Sustainability (Switzerland)
JF - Sustainability (Switzerland)
IS - 1
M1 - 188
ER -