TY - JOUR
T1 - Knee injury prevention in alpine skiing. A technological paradigm shift towards a mechatronic ski binding
AU - Hermann, Aljoscha
AU - Senner, Veit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Sports Medicine Australia
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Background: Skiing can be beneficial for the sense of delight and wellbeing. Nonetheless, the risk of injury should not be ignored. The traditional ski binding, working solely on a mechanical principle, performs well with regards to a prevention of mid-shaft tibia fracture. However, with respect to knee injuries, it is not able to provide protection. Future concepts, such as mechatronic binding designs have the potential to decrease knee injuries that traditional bindings cannot prevent. In addition to mechanical loads, this kind of binding design uses additional parameters, e.g. knee kinematics and the skier's muscle state, to control the binding release. Methods: This paper provides a review about our knowledge of injury mechanisms in recreational alpine skiing and previous work regarding mechatronic ski binding concepts. Also, our own biomechanical approach towards a mechatronic ski binding is described. Four input variables for an algorithm are discussed with respect to existing sensor solutions and designs of our own. A concept for an algorithm, based on our current knowledge in injury mechanisms is presented. Conclusions: Though first designs were described in the 80s, for decades the idea of a mechatronic ski binding was not further pursued by research. Technological improvements in the field of micro-electronics and wearable sensors, as well as decreasing costs of these devices, make a mechatronic concept feasible. Main challenge is still the missing knowledge about injury mechanisms in alpine skiing and hence the quantification of the influence of possible input variables for the mechatronic system on those injuries.
AB - Background: Skiing can be beneficial for the sense of delight and wellbeing. Nonetheless, the risk of injury should not be ignored. The traditional ski binding, working solely on a mechanical principle, performs well with regards to a prevention of mid-shaft tibia fracture. However, with respect to knee injuries, it is not able to provide protection. Future concepts, such as mechatronic binding designs have the potential to decrease knee injuries that traditional bindings cannot prevent. In addition to mechanical loads, this kind of binding design uses additional parameters, e.g. knee kinematics and the skier's muscle state, to control the binding release. Methods: This paper provides a review about our knowledge of injury mechanisms in recreational alpine skiing and previous work regarding mechatronic ski binding concepts. Also, our own biomechanical approach towards a mechatronic ski binding is described. Four input variables for an algorithm are discussed with respect to existing sensor solutions and designs of our own. A concept for an algorithm, based on our current knowledge in injury mechanisms is presented. Conclusions: Though first designs were described in the 80s, for decades the idea of a mechatronic ski binding was not further pursued by research. Technological improvements in the field of micro-electronics and wearable sensors, as well as decreasing costs of these devices, make a mechatronic concept feasible. Main challenge is still the missing knowledge about injury mechanisms in alpine skiing and hence the quantification of the influence of possible input variables for the mechatronic system on those injuries.
KW - Algorithms
KW - Anterior cruciate ligament
KW - Mechatronic ski binding
KW - Safety
KW - Sensors
KW - Sports injuries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087420919&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.06.009
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32631774
AN - SCOPUS:85087420919
SN - 1440-2440
VL - 24
SP - 1038
EP - 1043
JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
IS - 10
ER -