TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating accountability for Artificial Intelligence through risk governance
T2 - A workshop-based exploratory study
AU - Hohma, Ellen
AU - Boch, Auxane
AU - Trauth, Rainer
AU - Lütge, Christoph
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Hohma, Boch, Trauth and Lütge.
PY - 2023/1/25
Y1 - 2023/1/25
N2 - Introduction: With the growing prevalence of AI-based systems and the development of specific regulations and standardizations in response, accountability for consequences resulting from the development or use of these technologies becomes increasingly important. However, concrete strategies and approaches of solving related challenges seem to not have been suitably developed for or communicated with AI practitioners. Methods: Studying how risk governance methods can be (re)used to administer AI accountability, we aim at contributing to closing this gap. We chose an exploratory workshop-based methodology to investigate current challenges for accountability and risk management approaches raised by AI practitioners from academia and industry. Results and Discussion: Our interactive study design revealed various insights on which aspects do or do not work for handling risks of AI in practice. From the gathered perspectives, we derived 5 required characteristics for AI risk management methodologies (balance, extendability, representation, transparency and long-term orientation) and determined demands for clarification and action (e.g., for the definition of risk and accountabilities or standardization of risk governance and management) in the effort to move AI accountability from a conceptual stage to industry practice.
AB - Introduction: With the growing prevalence of AI-based systems and the development of specific regulations and standardizations in response, accountability for consequences resulting from the development or use of these technologies becomes increasingly important. However, concrete strategies and approaches of solving related challenges seem to not have been suitably developed for or communicated with AI practitioners. Methods: Studying how risk governance methods can be (re)used to administer AI accountability, we aim at contributing to closing this gap. We chose an exploratory workshop-based methodology to investigate current challenges for accountability and risk management approaches raised by AI practitioners from academia and industry. Results and Discussion: Our interactive study design revealed various insights on which aspects do or do not work for handling risks of AI in practice. From the gathered perspectives, we derived 5 required characteristics for AI risk management methodologies (balance, extendability, representation, transparency and long-term orientation) and determined demands for clarification and action (e.g., for the definition of risk and accountabilities or standardization of risk governance and management) in the effort to move AI accountability from a conceptual stage to industry practice.
KW - Artificial Intelligence
KW - accountability
KW - organizational framework
KW - risk governance
KW - workshop
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147709675&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1073686
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1073686
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85147709675
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 14
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
M1 - 1073686
ER -