TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving UV/H2O2 performance following tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater
AU - Ulliman, Sydney L.
AU - Miklos, David B.
AU - Hübner, Uwe
AU - Drewes, Jörg E.
AU - Linden, Karl G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - The ability of UV/AOP to treat trace organic contaminants (TOrCs) in wastewater is inhibited by (1) UV light-absorbing species and (2) hydroxyl radical (OH) scavenging species. We address these challenges by investigating four diverse technologies, single-stage biofiltration, sequential biofiltration, coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation-filtration (CFSF), and nanofiltration, as options for improving water quality conditions just prior to UV treatment, with and without added hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). By evaluating UV254 transmittance (UVT), OH scavengers, and OH steady-state concentrations, we found nanofiltration treatment to produce the most favorable pre-UV and UV/H2O2 water quality conditions. In comparing CFSF, single-stage biofiltration and sequential biofiltration treatment, CFSF treatment resulted in the highest increase in UVT and all three technologies reduced the scavenging capacity by ∼24% despite differences in removal of typical OH scavengers. UV and UV/H2O2 performance were evaluated by tracking the degradation rates of 11 targeted TOrCs for each pre-UV/H2O2 treatment scenario. Applying the additional treatment, average pseudo first-order degradation rates of TOrCs under UV/H2O2 increased by 20 to 92%, informing potential strategies to increase the oxidation potential of UV/AOP systems applied to wastewater.
AB - The ability of UV/AOP to treat trace organic contaminants (TOrCs) in wastewater is inhibited by (1) UV light-absorbing species and (2) hydroxyl radical (OH) scavenging species. We address these challenges by investigating four diverse technologies, single-stage biofiltration, sequential biofiltration, coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation-filtration (CFSF), and nanofiltration, as options for improving water quality conditions just prior to UV treatment, with and without added hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). By evaluating UV254 transmittance (UVT), OH scavengers, and OH steady-state concentrations, we found nanofiltration treatment to produce the most favorable pre-UV and UV/H2O2 water quality conditions. In comparing CFSF, single-stage biofiltration and sequential biofiltration treatment, CFSF treatment resulted in the highest increase in UVT and all three technologies reduced the scavenging capacity by ∼24% despite differences in removal of typical OH scavengers. UV and UV/H2O2 performance were evaluated by tracking the degradation rates of 11 targeted TOrCs for each pre-UV/H2O2 treatment scenario. Applying the additional treatment, average pseudo first-order degradation rates of TOrCs under UV/H2O2 increased by 20 to 92%, informing potential strategies to increase the oxidation potential of UV/AOP systems applied to wastewater.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052573187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/c8ew00233a
DO - 10.1039/c8ew00233a
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052573187
SN - 2053-1400
VL - 4
SP - 1321
EP - 1330
JO - Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology
JF - Environmental Science: Water Research and Technology
IS - 9
ER -