TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation of an integrated care programme to avoid fragility fractures of the hip in older adults in 18 Bavarian hospitals – study protocol for the cluster-randomised controlled fracture liaison service FLS-CARE
AU - FLS-CARE study group
AU - Geiger, Isabel
AU - Kammerlander, Christian
AU - Höfer, Christine
AU - Volland, Ruth
AU - Trinemeier, Jörg
AU - Henschelchen, Martina
AU - Friess, Thomas
AU - Andrae, Ursula
AU - Stäudel, Christian
AU - Andress, Hans Joachim
AU - Liese, Theresa
AU - Behnke, Maik
AU - Stojanovic, Milos
AU - Brunner, Ulrich
AU - Schreiber, Sabine
AU - Gradl, Georg
AU - Fürst, Benedikt
AU - Grote, Stefan
AU - Schmid, Constantin
AU - Grüninger, Sebastian
AU - Wicklein, Susanne
AU - Lewens, Tobias
AU - Gelse, Kolja
AU - Löffler, Thomas
AU - Bendiks, Martin
AU - Meffert, Rainer H.
AU - Schmitz, Benedikt
AU - Neuerburg, Carl
AU - Odenwald, Martin
AU - Thoma, Maximilian
AU - Schmitz, Paul
AU - Kretschmer, Rainer
AU - Schupfner, Rupert
AU - Pfeifer, Eva
AU - Solovyov, Igor
AU - Linder, Christian
AU - Stumpf, Ulla
AU - Werther, Jutta
AU - Fenwick, Annabel
AU - Zeckey, Christian
AU - Ditto, Joseph
AU - Böcker, Wolfgang
AU - Sundmacher, Leonie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: The economic and public health burden of fragility fractures of the hip in Germany is high. The likelihood of requiring long-term care and the risk of suffering from a secondary fracture increases substantially after sustaining an initial fracture. Neither appropriate confirmatory diagnostics of the suspected underlying osteoporosis nor therapy, which are well-recognised approaches to reduce the burden of fragility fractures, are routinely initiated in the German healthcare system. Therefore, the aim of the study FLS-CARE is to evaluate whether a coordinated care programme can close the prevention gap for patients suffering from a fragility hip fracture through the implementation of systematic diagnostics, a falls prevention programme and guideline-adherent interventions based on the Fracture Liaison Services model. Methods: The study is set up as a non-blinded, cluster-randomised, controlled trial with unequal cluster sizes. Allocation to intervention group (FLS-CARE) and control group (usual care) follows an allocation ratio of 1:1 using trauma centres as the unit of allocation. Sample size calculations resulted in a total of 1216 patients (608 patients per group distributed over 9 clusters) needed for the analysis. After informed consent, all participants are assessed directly at discharge, after 3 months, 12 months and 24 months. The primary outcome measure of the study is the secondary fracture rate 24 months after initial hip fracture. Secondary outcomes include differences in the number of falls, mortality, quality-adjusted life years, activities of daily living and mobility. Discussion: This study is the first to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness/utility of FLS implementation in Germany. Findings of the process evaluation will also shed light on potential barriers to the implementation of FLS in the context of the German healthcare system. Challenges for the study include the successful integration of the outpatient sector as well as the future course of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 and its influence on the intervention.
AB - Background: The economic and public health burden of fragility fractures of the hip in Germany is high. The likelihood of requiring long-term care and the risk of suffering from a secondary fracture increases substantially after sustaining an initial fracture. Neither appropriate confirmatory diagnostics of the suspected underlying osteoporosis nor therapy, which are well-recognised approaches to reduce the burden of fragility fractures, are routinely initiated in the German healthcare system. Therefore, the aim of the study FLS-CARE is to evaluate whether a coordinated care programme can close the prevention gap for patients suffering from a fragility hip fracture through the implementation of systematic diagnostics, a falls prevention programme and guideline-adherent interventions based on the Fracture Liaison Services model. Methods: The study is set up as a non-blinded, cluster-randomised, controlled trial with unequal cluster sizes. Allocation to intervention group (FLS-CARE) and control group (usual care) follows an allocation ratio of 1:1 using trauma centres as the unit of allocation. Sample size calculations resulted in a total of 1216 patients (608 patients per group distributed over 9 clusters) needed for the analysis. After informed consent, all participants are assessed directly at discharge, after 3 months, 12 months and 24 months. The primary outcome measure of the study is the secondary fracture rate 24 months after initial hip fracture. Secondary outcomes include differences in the number of falls, mortality, quality-adjusted life years, activities of daily living and mobility. Discussion: This study is the first to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness/utility of FLS implementation in Germany. Findings of the process evaluation will also shed light on potential barriers to the implementation of FLS in the context of the German healthcare system. Challenges for the study include the successful integration of the outpatient sector as well as the future course of the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 and its influence on the intervention.
KW - Fracture liaison service
KW - Fragility fracture
KW - Hip fracture
KW - Integrated care
KW - Osteoporosis
KW - Secondary prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099891657&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12877-020-01966-1
DO - 10.1186/s12877-020-01966-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 33435869
AN - SCOPUS:85099891657
SN - 1471-2318
VL - 21
JO - BMC Geriatrics
JF - BMC Geriatrics
IS - 1
M1 - 43
ER -