TY - JOUR
T1 - Imaging of the Osteoporotic Spine - Quantitative Approaches in Diagnostics and for the Prediction of the Individual Fracture Risk
AU - Sollmann, Nico
AU - Kirschke, Jan Stefan
AU - Kronthaler, Sophia
AU - Boehm, Christof
AU - Dieckmeyer, Michael
AU - Vogele, Daniel
AU - Kloth, Christopher
AU - Lisson, Christoph Gerhard
AU - Carballido-Gamio, Julio
AU - Link, Thomas Marc
AU - Karampinos, Dimitrios Charalampos
AU - Karupppasamy, Subburaj
AU - Beer, Meinrad
AU - Krug, Roland
AU - Baum, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/10/1
Y1 - 2022/10/1
N2 - Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent systemic skeletal disease that is characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural bone deterioration. It predisposes to fragility fractures that can occur at various sites of the skeleton, but vertebral fractures (VFs) have been shown to be particularly common. Prevention strategies and timely intervention depend on reliable diagnosis and prediction of the individual fracture risk, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been the reference standard for decades. Yet, DXA has its inherent limitations, and other techniques have shown potential as viable add-on or even stand-alone options. Specifically, three-dimensional (3D) imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are playing an increasing role. For CT, recent advances in medical image analysis now allow automatic vertebral segmentation and value extraction from single vertebral bodies using a deep-learning-based architecture that can be implemented in clinical practice. Regarding MRI, a variety of methods have been developed over recent years, including magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and chemical shift encoding-based water-fat MRI (CSE-MRI) that enable the extraction of a vertebral body's proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as a promising surrogate biomarker of bone health. Yet, imaging data from CT or MRI may be more efficiently used when combined with advanced analysis techniques such as texture analysis (TA; to provide spatially resolved assessments of vertebral body composition) or finite element analysis (FEA; to provide estimates of bone strength) to further improve fracture prediction. However, distinct and experimentally validated diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis based on CT- and MRI-derived measures have not yet been achieved, limiting broad transfer to clinical practice for these novel approaches. Key Points: DXA is the reference standard for diagnosis and fracture prediction in osteoporosis, but it has important limitations. CT- and MRI-based methods are increasingly used as (opportunistic) approaches. For CT, particularly deep-learning-based automatic vertebral segmentation and value extraction seem promising. For MRI, multiple techniques including spectroscopy and chemical shift imaging are available to extract fat fractions. Texture and finite element analyses can provide additional measures for vertebral body composition and bone strength. Citation Format Sollmann N, Kirschke JS, Kronthaler S etal. Imaging of the Osteoporotic Spine - Quantitative Approaches in Diagnostics and for the Prediction of the Individual Fracture Risk. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 1088-1099.
AB - Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent systemic skeletal disease that is characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural bone deterioration. It predisposes to fragility fractures that can occur at various sites of the skeleton, but vertebral fractures (VFs) have been shown to be particularly common. Prevention strategies and timely intervention depend on reliable diagnosis and prediction of the individual fracture risk, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been the reference standard for decades. Yet, DXA has its inherent limitations, and other techniques have shown potential as viable add-on or even stand-alone options. Specifically, three-dimensional (3D) imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are playing an increasing role. For CT, recent advances in medical image analysis now allow automatic vertebral segmentation and value extraction from single vertebral bodies using a deep-learning-based architecture that can be implemented in clinical practice. Regarding MRI, a variety of methods have been developed over recent years, including magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and chemical shift encoding-based water-fat MRI (CSE-MRI) that enable the extraction of a vertebral body's proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as a promising surrogate biomarker of bone health. Yet, imaging data from CT or MRI may be more efficiently used when combined with advanced analysis techniques such as texture analysis (TA; to provide spatially resolved assessments of vertebral body composition) or finite element analysis (FEA; to provide estimates of bone strength) to further improve fracture prediction. However, distinct and experimentally validated diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis based on CT- and MRI-derived measures have not yet been achieved, limiting broad transfer to clinical practice for these novel approaches. Key Points: DXA is the reference standard for diagnosis and fracture prediction in osteoporosis, but it has important limitations. CT- and MRI-based methods are increasingly used as (opportunistic) approaches. For CT, particularly deep-learning-based automatic vertebral segmentation and value extraction seem promising. For MRI, multiple techniques including spectroscopy and chemical shift imaging are available to extract fat fractions. Texture and finite element analyses can provide additional measures for vertebral body composition and bone strength. Citation Format Sollmann N, Kirschke JS, Kronthaler S etal. Imaging of the Osteoporotic Spine - Quantitative Approaches in Diagnostics and for the Prediction of the Individual Fracture Risk. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 1088-1099.
KW - bone mineral density
KW - computed tomography
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - proton density fat fraction
KW - quantitative imaging
KW - vertebral fracture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130620647&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/a-1770-4626
DO - 10.1055/a-1770-4626
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35545103
AN - SCOPUS:85130620647
SN - 1438-9029
VL - 194
SP - 1088
EP - 1099
JO - RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren
JF - RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren
IS - 10
ER -