TY - GEN
T1 - How flexible is dynamic SDN control plane?
AU - He, Mu
AU - Basta, Arsany
AU - Blenk, Andreas
AU - Kellerer, Wolfgang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IEEE.
PY - 2017/11/20
Y1 - 2017/11/20
N2 - In Software Defined Networking (SDN), for performance reasons the control plane consists of multiple SDN controllers that provide a logically centralized network control. To react to traffic changes, the control plane may adapt to improve the performance of the whole network. This adaptation includes the migration of controllers, i.e. the change of their placement, as well as the change of switch to controller assignments. We call such adaptive network control a dynamic SDN control plane. Whereas most state of the art focuses on an optimal placement of controllers considering static traffic demands, we draw the attention to the need for a dynamic control plane and the performance of the adaption process itself. The involved controller migration and switch re-assignments significantly affect the control plane performance. Moreover, in this work we evaluate the flexibility of a dynamic SDN control plane with respect to the number of controllers. In particular, we refer to a flexibility metric that takes the time into account that is needed for successful migrations to handle traffic changes. Our evaluations are based on detailed models of controller placement and migration time. The results confirm that the migration time is a critical parameter and reveal that in case only a short migration time is allowed, the number of controllers does not bring more flexibility. For relaxed migration times, a larger number of controllers leads to more flexibility as expected. The results also show that a dynamic adaptation to traffic changes, can provide an improvement of up to 60% over a non-dynamic SDN control plane.
AB - In Software Defined Networking (SDN), for performance reasons the control plane consists of multiple SDN controllers that provide a logically centralized network control. To react to traffic changes, the control plane may adapt to improve the performance of the whole network. This adaptation includes the migration of controllers, i.e. the change of their placement, as well as the change of switch to controller assignments. We call such adaptive network control a dynamic SDN control plane. Whereas most state of the art focuses on an optimal placement of controllers considering static traffic demands, we draw the attention to the need for a dynamic control plane and the performance of the adaption process itself. The involved controller migration and switch re-assignments significantly affect the control plane performance. Moreover, in this work we evaluate the flexibility of a dynamic SDN control plane with respect to the number of controllers. In particular, we refer to a flexibility metric that takes the time into account that is needed for successful migrations to handle traffic changes. Our evaluations are based on detailed models of controller placement and migration time. The results confirm that the migration time is a critical parameter and reveal that in case only a short migration time is allowed, the number of controllers does not bring more flexibility. For relaxed migration times, a larger number of controllers leads to more flexibility as expected. The results also show that a dynamic adaptation to traffic changes, can provide an improvement of up to 60% over a non-dynamic SDN control plane.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85041351802
U2 - 10.1109/INFCOMW.2017.8116460
DO - 10.1109/INFCOMW.2017.8116460
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85041351802
T3 - 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops, INFOCOM WKSHPS 2017
SP - 689
EP - 694
BT - 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops, INFOCOM WKSHPS 2017
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops, INFOCOM WKSHPS 2017
Y2 - 1 May 2017 through 4 May 2017
ER -