Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Guselkumab demonstrates long-term efficacy and maintenance of treatment response postwithdrawal in systemic treatment-naïve patients and nonresponders to fumaric acid esters: results from parts II and III of a randomized active-comparator-controlled phase IIIb trial (POLARIS)

  • Diamant Thaçi
  • , Andreas Pinter
  • , Michael Sebastian
  • , Christian Termeer
  • , Michael Sticherling
  • , Sascha Gerdes
  • , Knut Schäkel
  • , Sven Wegner
  • , Stefanie Krampe
  • , Holger Bartz
  • , Christian Rausch
  • , Friedemann Taut
  • , Kilian Eyerich
  • University of Lübeck
  • Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität
  • Dermatological Practice Dr. med. Michael Sebastian
  • Dermatological Practice Prof. Dr. med. Christian Termeer
  • University of Freiburg
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
  • University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Janssen-Cilag
  • TautScience and Service Ltd
  • University of Freiburg

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

2 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The anti-interleukin-23 antibody guselkumab (GUS) demonstrated favourable week 24 efficacy and safety over fumaric acid esters (FAE) in systemic treatment-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (study part I). Objectives To compare, in study part II, the sustainability of treatment responses (weeks 24-32) in GUS- and FAE-treated patients and treatment responses (weeks 32-56) in patients treated with GUS and FAE and in FAE nonresponders switching to GUS; and, in part III, to investigate the maintenance of response through week 100 in patients withdrawn from GUS at week 56. Methods At week 0, systemic treatment-naïve patients were randomized 1 : 1 to GUS or FAE as per label. At week 32, patients with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 (≥ 75% improvement in PASI score) response (r) continued assigned treatment (GUSr-GUS; FAEr- FAE), whereas nonresponders (nr) received GUS (FAEnr-GUS; GUSnr-GUS). GUS-treated patients with a week 56 PASI 90 response (≥ 90% improvement in PASI score) were withdrawn (w) and followed until loss of response or week 100. Results At week 32, 98% (n = 54/55) of GUS- and 41% (n = 14/34) of FAE-treated patients were PASI 75 responders. At week 56, 91%, 50% and 80% of GUSr-GUS, FAEr-FAE and FAEnr-GUS patients, respectively, achieved a PASI 90 response; 72%, 29% and 45%, respectively, achieved a Dermatology Life Quality Index score of 0/1. At week 100, 44 weeks postwithdrawal, 47% (n = 17/36) and 25% (n = 3/12) of GUS-GUSw and FAEGUSw patients, respectively, maintained a PASI score ≤ 5. Overall, the adverse event and discontinuation rates were lower for GUS than FAE. Conclusions In these exploratory analyses, GUS, as a first-line systemic treatment or second-line systemic treatment in FAE nonresponders, was associated with long-term clinical efficacy up to week 100, including a withdrawal period.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)36-48
Seitenumfang13
FachzeitschriftBritish Journal of Dermatology
Jahrgang191
Ausgabenummer1
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Juli 2024
Extern publiziertJa

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Guselkumab demonstrates long-term efficacy and maintenance of treatment response postwithdrawal in systemic treatment-naïve patients and nonresponders to fumaric acid esters: results from parts II and III of a randomized active-comparator-controlled phase IIIb trial (POLARIS)“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren