Garden thinking in cities of tomorrow

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

Abstract

Since the middle of the 19th century, when the term ‘landscape architecture’ began to replace the hitherto common term ‘garden art’, the garden as a work of art and gardening, understood as a predominantly decorative activity, stood in the critical discussion about the future of the metropolises. It was not only architects and urban planners who repeatedly questioned the value of ornamental gardens in the city. Against the background of the enormous growth of the cities in the industrial age and the accompanying social problems, leading European landscape architects in the 20th century like Leberecht Migge (1881-1935), Ernst Cramer (1898-1980), and Dieter Kienast (1945-1998) stated that gardening is neither artistic work nor scientific planning, neither modern nor progressive. Given the respective historical context as well as the particular conception of city and society, this criticism is comprehensible. In the 21st century though, the garden as a living component in the ‘network metropolis’, and gardening itself, especially ‘urban gardening’, were experiencing a remarkable renaissance. Against the background of today’s rapid development of the ‘Zwischenstadt’, it turns out that the basic principles of garden thinking never really lost their relevance.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)113-130
Seitenumfang18
FachzeitschriftSpool
Jahrgang7
Ausgabenummer1
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2020

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Garden thinking in cities of tomorrow“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.
  • Garden Thinking and Garden Action

    Weilacher, U., 2024, Garden and Metaphor. Essays on the Essence of the Garden. Kucan, A. & Kurir, M. (Hrsg.). Birkhäuser Verlag, S. 95-100 6 S.

    Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/KonferenzbandKapitel

Dieses zitieren