TY - JOUR
T1 - Functionality and performance of customized sole inlays for various sports applications
AU - Janta, Marius
AU - Ebert, Christoph
AU - Senner, Veit
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - To increase product value and consumer satisfaction customization has become a major aspect in product development. From the consumers' perspective this trend towards individual fitting is certainly positive as long as it does not negatively influence other sports specific functionality parameters. The current study is dealing with this interaction heading towards customizing effects in footwear. A long term field test was conducted to determine which design parameters of a customized insole embodies the highest benefit for the athlete perceived performance. A test assembly of 20 athletes evaluated a traditional and a customized insole under three different sport conditions 1) indoor sports, 2) outdoor sports, and 3) running). A questionnaire was designed that asked for nine functions at six decisive foot segments (heel, metatarsal, forefoot; lateral, medial); 1) optimal roll off, 2) cushioning, 3) force transmission, 4) feet support, 5) bedding, 6) secure step, 7) avoid slipping 8) avoid pressure and 9) avoid pain. These items were subjectively evaluated by our test persons and finally correlated with initially collected objective measures. Static and dynamic plantar pressure measurements provided data for individual foot sole profiles. Results showed four important outcomes. Firstly, different sports applications require different functional insoles to ensure optimal athlete perception and performance. Secondly the grade of customization increases their perceived performance. Thirdly objective and subjective data are both required to ensure optimal insole supply. And fourthly subjects are rather limited in their ability to distinguish effects of insole design modifications. Especially the last finding raises the question how far customization should be expanded and where it unnecessarily goes beyond practical relevance.
AB - To increase product value and consumer satisfaction customization has become a major aspect in product development. From the consumers' perspective this trend towards individual fitting is certainly positive as long as it does not negatively influence other sports specific functionality parameters. The current study is dealing with this interaction heading towards customizing effects in footwear. A long term field test was conducted to determine which design parameters of a customized insole embodies the highest benefit for the athlete perceived performance. A test assembly of 20 athletes evaluated a traditional and a customized insole under three different sport conditions 1) indoor sports, 2) outdoor sports, and 3) running). A questionnaire was designed that asked for nine functions at six decisive foot segments (heel, metatarsal, forefoot; lateral, medial); 1) optimal roll off, 2) cushioning, 3) force transmission, 4) feet support, 5) bedding, 6) secure step, 7) avoid slipping 8) avoid pressure and 9) avoid pain. These items were subjectively evaluated by our test persons and finally correlated with initially collected objective measures. Static and dynamic plantar pressure measurements provided data for individual foot sole profiles. Results showed four important outcomes. Firstly, different sports applications require different functional insoles to ensure optimal athlete perception and performance. Secondly the grade of customization increases their perceived performance. Thirdly objective and subjective data are both required to ensure optimal insole supply. And fourthly subjects are rather limited in their ability to distinguish effects of insole design modifications. Especially the last finding raises the question how far customization should be expanded and where it unnecessarily goes beyond practical relevance.
KW - Footwear
KW - Functionality
KW - Perception
KW - Performance enhancement
KW - Sole inlays
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871357171&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.04.050
DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.04.050
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:84871357171
SN - 1877-7058
VL - 34
SP - 290
EP - 294
JO - Procedia Engineering
JF - Procedia Engineering
T2 - 9th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, ISEA 2012
Y2 - 9 July 2012 through 13 July 2012
ER -