TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of forest management on ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera; Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in Central Europe are mainly mediated by changes in forest structure
AU - Lange, Markus
AU - Türke, Manfred
AU - Pašalić, Esther
AU - Boch, Steffen
AU - Hessenmöller, Dominik
AU - Müller, Jörg
AU - Prati, Daniel
AU - Socher, Stephanie A.
AU - Fischer, Markus
AU - Weisser, Wolfgang W.
AU - Gossner, Martin M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the managers of the three Exploratories, S. Renner, S. Gockel, A. Hemp, M. Gorke and S. Pfeiffer for their work in maintaining the plot and project infrastructure, and late E. Kalko, K.E. Linsenmair, J. Nieschulze, F. Buscot, and E.-D. Schulze for their role in setting up the Biodiversity Exploratories Project. We are grateful to all colleagues and students who contributed to this study, to the local management teams for generous support of our study. Further, we thank B. Büche, M.-A. Fritze, T. Kölckebeck and F. Köhler for species identification and S.T. Meyer and J. Schumacher for fruitful discussion on statistical issues. Constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers improved the manuscript considerably. We are grateful to Shaun R. Levick for linguistic revision. The work has been funded by the DFG Priority Program 1374 “Infrastructure-Biodiversity-Exploratories” (WE 3018/9-1). Field work permits were issued by the responsible state environmental offices of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Thuringia and Brandenburg (according to § 72 BbgNatSchG).
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - Forest management is known to influence species diversity of various taxa but inconsistent or even contrasting effects are reported for arthropods. Regional differences in management as well as differences in regional species pools might be responsible for these inconsistencies, but, inter-regional replicated studies that account for regional variability are rare. We investigated the effect of forest type on the abundance, diversity, community structure and composition of two important ground-dwelling beetle families, Carabidae and Staphylinidae, in 149 forest stands distributed over three regions in Germany. In particular we focused on recent forestry history, stand age and dominant tree species, in addition to a number of environmental descriptors. Overall management effects on beetle communities were small and mainly mediated by structural habitat parameters such as the cover of forest canopy or the plant diversity on forest stands. The general response of both beetle taxa to forest management was similar in all regions: abundance and species richness of beetles was higher in older than in younger stands and species richness was lower in unmanaged than in managed stands. The abundance ratio of forest species-to-open habitat species differed between regions, but generally increased from young to old stands, from coniferous to deciduous stands and from managed to unmanaged stands. The response of both beetle families to dominant tree species was variable among regions and staphylinid richness varied in the response to recent forestry history. Our results suggest that current forest management practices change the composition of ground-dwelling beetle communities mainly by favoring generalists and open habitat species. To protect important forest beetle communities and thus the ecosystem functions and services provided by them, we suggest to shelter remaining ancient forests and to develop near-to-nature management strategies by prolonging rotation periods and increasing structural diversity of managed forests. Possible geographic variations in the response of beetle communities need to be considered in conservation-orientated forest management strategies.
AB - Forest management is known to influence species diversity of various taxa but inconsistent or even contrasting effects are reported for arthropods. Regional differences in management as well as differences in regional species pools might be responsible for these inconsistencies, but, inter-regional replicated studies that account for regional variability are rare. We investigated the effect of forest type on the abundance, diversity, community structure and composition of two important ground-dwelling beetle families, Carabidae and Staphylinidae, in 149 forest stands distributed over three regions in Germany. In particular we focused on recent forestry history, stand age and dominant tree species, in addition to a number of environmental descriptors. Overall management effects on beetle communities were small and mainly mediated by structural habitat parameters such as the cover of forest canopy or the plant diversity on forest stands. The general response of both beetle taxa to forest management was similar in all regions: abundance and species richness of beetles was higher in older than in younger stands and species richness was lower in unmanaged than in managed stands. The abundance ratio of forest species-to-open habitat species differed between regions, but generally increased from young to old stands, from coniferous to deciduous stands and from managed to unmanaged stands. The response of both beetle families to dominant tree species was variable among regions and staphylinid richness varied in the response to recent forestry history. Our results suggest that current forest management practices change the composition of ground-dwelling beetle communities mainly by favoring generalists and open habitat species. To protect important forest beetle communities and thus the ecosystem functions and services provided by them, we suggest to shelter remaining ancient forests and to develop near-to-nature management strategies by prolonging rotation periods and increasing structural diversity of managed forests. Possible geographic variations in the response of beetle communities need to be considered in conservation-orientated forest management strategies.
KW - Beech forest
KW - Biodiversity exploratories
KW - Conifer plantations
KW - Habitat preferences
KW - Insects
KW - Land use
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904053940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.012
DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84904053940
SN - 0378-1127
VL - 329
SP - 166
EP - 176
JO - Forest Ecology and Management
JF - Forest Ecology and Management
ER -