Editorial to Part I “Revisioning, Rethinking, Restructuring Gender at Work: Quo Vadis Gender Stereotypes?”

Alina S. Hernandez Bark, Nina M. Junker, Ronit Kark, Thekla Morgenroth, Claudia Peus, Rolf van Dick

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

3 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

The papers in this Special Issue Part I “Revisioning, Rethinking, Restructuring Gender at Work: Quo Vadis Gender Stereotypes?” focus on the current state of gender inequality, particularly stereotypes. We present studies showing that differences in gender stereotypes still exist, confirm disadvantages for women in male-dominated roles and sectors and when the employment sector is not specified, but also disadvantages for men in female-dominated roles and sectors. In contrast to this general trend, one paper in Part II of this Special Issue found a preference for women over men as job candidates in their study. Incongruence emerged as a striking common theme to explain these gender differences, whereby some studies focused on the perceived incongruence from the actor's perspective and how external factors contribute to these perceptions, whereas others looked at the perceived incongruence from the observer's perspective. We summarize the papers and briefly discuss the key points of Part I at the end of this editorial.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)563-567
Seitenumfang5
FachzeitschriftJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Jahrgang52
Ausgabenummer8
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Aug. 2022

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Editorial to Part I “Revisioning, Rethinking, Restructuring Gender at Work: Quo Vadis Gender Stereotypes?”“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren