TY - JOUR
T1 - Earnings information and public preferences for university tuition
T2 - Evidence from representative experiments
AU - Lergetporer, Philipp
AU - Woessmann, Ludger
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Higher education finance depends on the public's preferences for charging tuition, which may be partly based on beliefs and awareness about the university earnings premium. To test whether public support for tuition depends on earnings information, we devise survey experiments in representative samples of the German electorate (N > 15,000). The electorate is divided, with a plurality opposing tuition. Providing information on the university earnings premium raises support for tuition by 7 percentage points, turning the plurality in favor. The opposition-reducing effect persists two weeks after treatment. While there is some evidence of information-based updating of biased beliefs, the effect seems to mainly work through increased salience which triggers reduced consideration of financial constraints when forming preferences for tuition. Information on fiscal costs and unequal access does not affect public preferences. We subject the baseline result to various experimental tests of replicability, robustness, heterogeneity, and consequentiality.
AB - Higher education finance depends on the public's preferences for charging tuition, which may be partly based on beliefs and awareness about the university earnings premium. To test whether public support for tuition depends on earnings information, we devise survey experiments in representative samples of the German electorate (N > 15,000). The electorate is divided, with a plurality opposing tuition. Providing information on the university earnings premium raises support for tuition by 7 percentage points, turning the plurality in favor. The opposition-reducing effect persists two weeks after treatment. While there is some evidence of information-based updating of biased beliefs, the effect seems to mainly work through increased salience which triggers reduced consideration of financial constraints when forming preferences for tuition. Information on fiscal costs and unequal access does not affect public preferences. We subject the baseline result to various experimental tests of replicability, robustness, heterogeneity, and consequentiality.
KW - Earnings premium
KW - Higher education
KW - Information
KW - Public opinion
KW - Tuition
KW - Voting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169833302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104968
DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104968
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85169833302
SN - 0047-2727
VL - 226
JO - Journal of Public Economics
JF - Journal of Public Economics
M1 - 104968
ER -