TY - JOUR
T1 - Discrete tomography
T2 - Determination of finite sets by X-rays
AU - Gardner, R. J.
AU - Gritzmann, Peter
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - We study the determination of finite subsets of the integer lattice Z", n > 2, by X-rays. In this context, an X-ray of a set in a direction u gives the number of points in the set on each line parallel to u. For practical reasons, only X-rays in lattice directions, that is, directions parallel to a nonzero vector in the lattice, are permitted. By combining methods from algebraic number theory and convexity, \ve prove that there are four prescribed lattice directions such that convex subsets of Zn (i.e., finite subsets F with F = Zn conv F) are determined, among all such sets, by their X-rays in these directions. \Ve also show that three X-rays do not suffice for this purpose. This answers a question of Larry Shepp, and yields a stability result related to Hammer's X-ray problem. We further show that any set of seven prescribed mutually nonparallel lattice directions in Z2 have the property that convex subsets of Z2 are determined, among all such sets, by their X-rays in these directions. We also consider the use of orthogonal projections in the interactive technique of successive determination, in which the information from previous projections can be used in deciding the direction for the next projection. We obtain results for finite subsets of the integer lattice and also for arbitrary finite subsets of Euclidean space which are the best possible with respect to the numbers of projections used.
AB - We study the determination of finite subsets of the integer lattice Z", n > 2, by X-rays. In this context, an X-ray of a set in a direction u gives the number of points in the set on each line parallel to u. For practical reasons, only X-rays in lattice directions, that is, directions parallel to a nonzero vector in the lattice, are permitted. By combining methods from algebraic number theory and convexity, \ve prove that there are four prescribed lattice directions such that convex subsets of Zn (i.e., finite subsets F with F = Zn conv F) are determined, among all such sets, by their X-rays in these directions. \Ve also show that three X-rays do not suffice for this purpose. This answers a question of Larry Shepp, and yields a stability result related to Hammer's X-ray problem. We further show that any set of seven prescribed mutually nonparallel lattice directions in Z2 have the property that convex subsets of Z2 are determined, among all such sets, by their X-rays in these directions. We also consider the use of orthogonal projections in the interactive technique of successive determination, in which the information from previous projections can be used in deciding the direction for the next projection. We obtain results for finite subsets of the integer lattice and also for arbitrary finite subsets of Euclidean space which are the best possible with respect to the numbers of projections used.
KW - Convex body
KW - Discrete tomography
KW - Lattice
KW - Lattice polygon
KW - P-adic valuation
KW - Projection
KW - Tomography
KW - X-ray
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21744459240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1090/s0002-9947-97-01741-8
DO - 10.1090/s0002-9947-97-01741-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:21744459240
SN - 0002-9947
VL - 349
SP - 2271
EP - 2295
JO - Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
JF - Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
IS - 6
ER -