Digital Rectal Examination Is Not a Useful Screening Test for Prostate Cancer

Agne Krilaviciute, Nikolaus Becker, Jale Lakes, Jan Philipp Radtke, Markus Kuczyk, Inga Peters, Nina N. Harke, Jürgen Debus, Stefan A. Koerber, Kathleen Herkommer, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Valentin H. Meissner, Axel Benner, Petra Seibold, Glen Kristiansen, Boris Hadaschik, Christian Arsov, Lars Schimmöller, Frederik Lars Giesel, Gerald AntochMarcus Makowski, Frank Wacker, Heinz Peter Schlemmer, Rudolf Kaaks, Peter Albers

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

6 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Annual digital rectal examination (DRE) is recommended as a stand-alone screening test for prostate cancer (PCa) in Germany for 45+ yr olds. DRE diagnostic performance in men as young as 45 yr old has not been proved by a screening trial. OBJECTIVE: To determine DRE diagnostic performance in a screening trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This analysis was conducted within the multicentric, randomized PROBASE trial, which enrolled >46 000 men at age 45 to test risk-adapted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for PCa. INTERVENTION: (1) DRE was analyzed as a one-time, stand-alone screening offer at age 45 in 6537 men in one arm of the trial and (2) PCa detection by DRE was evaluated at the time of PSA-screen-driven biopsies (N = 578). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: (1) True-/false-positive detection rates of DRE as compared with PSA screening and (2) DRE outcome at the time of a prostate biopsy were evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: (1) A prospective analysis of 57 men with suspicious DRE at age 45 revealed three PCa. Detection rate by DRE was 0.05% (three of 6537) as compared with a four-fold higher rate by PSA screening (48 of 23 301, 0.21%). The true-positive detection rate by DRE relative to screening by PSA was 0.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.07-0.72]) and the false-positive detection rate by DRE was 2.2 (95% CI = [1.50-3.17]). (2) Among PSA-screen-detected PCa cases, 86% had unsuspicious DRE (sensitivity relative to PSA was 14%), with the majority of these tumors (86%) located in the potentially accessible zones of the prostate as seen by magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of stand-alone DRE to screen for PCa is poor. DRE should not be recommended as a PCa screening test in young men. Furthermore, DRE does not improve the detection of PSA-screen-detected PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our report demonstrated the poor diagnostic performance of digital rectal examination in the screening for prostate cancer in young men.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)566-573
Seitenumfang8
FachzeitschriftEuropean urology oncology
Jahrgang6
Ausgabenummer6
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Dez. 2023

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Digital Rectal Examination Is Not a Useful Screening Test for Prostate Cancer“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren