Die zweite meinung in der tumorchirurgie

H. Feussner, D. Wilhelm, M. Etter, J. R. Siewert

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftKurzer AbrissBegutachtung

3 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

In complicated oncological cases, a second opinion is desirable, also in the view of the care-providing surgeon. It serves interdisciplinary therapeutic planning, and helps improve the quality of treatment. In the case of highly consequential interventions, the patient has a legal right to a second opinion. On a practical level, however, the implementation of this possibility encounters problems: organizational shortcomings, incomplete patient documentation, the stresses of patient transportation, loss of valuable time, in particular in the case of postal consultation, following consultation in a center the carrying out of treatment there, whether at the urging of the doctors there or the patient himself, lack of remuneration for the efforts of the consultants. Today, however, all the necessary technical facilities are in place to enable various experts to be consulted, virtually simultaneously, on any case, via videoconferencing.

Titel in ÜbersetzungSecond opinion in oncological surgery. Benefits and problems in the view of the surgeon
OriginalspracheDeutsch
Seiten (von - bis)22-25
Seitenumfang4
FachzeitschriftMMW-Fortschritte der Medizin
Jahrgang142
Ausgabenummer4
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 27 Jan. 2000

Schlagwörter

  • Economic background
  • Oncological surgery
  • Second opinion
  • Videoconferencing

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Die zweite meinung in der tumorchirurgie“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren