TY - GEN
T1 - Determining the point of minimum error for 6DOF pose uncertainty representation
AU - Pustka, Daniel
AU - Willneff, Jochen
AU - Wenisch, Oliver
AU - Lükewille, Peter
AU - Achatz, Kurt
AU - Keitler, Peter
AU - Klinker, Gudrun
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - In many augmented reality applications, in particular in the medical and industrial domains, knowledge about tracking errors is important. Most current approaches characterize tracking errors by 6x6 covariance matrices that describe the uncertainty of a 6DOF pose, where the center of rotational error lies in the origin of a target coordinate system. This origin is assumed to coincide with the geometric centroid of a tracking target. In this paper, we show that, in case of a multi-camera fiducial tracking system, the geometric centroid of a body does not necessarily coincide with the point of minimum error. The latter is not fixed to a particular location, but moves, depending on the individual observations. We describe how to compute this point of minimum error given a covariance matrix and verify the validity of the approach using Monte Carlo simulations on a number of scenarios. Looking at the movement of the point of minimum error, we find that it can be located surprisingly far away from its expected position. This is further validated by an experiment using a real camera system.
AB - In many augmented reality applications, in particular in the medical and industrial domains, knowledge about tracking errors is important. Most current approaches characterize tracking errors by 6x6 covariance matrices that describe the uncertainty of a 6DOF pose, where the center of rotational error lies in the origin of a target coordinate system. This origin is assumed to coincide with the geometric centroid of a tracking target. In this paper, we show that, in case of a multi-camera fiducial tracking system, the geometric centroid of a body does not necessarily coincide with the point of minimum error. The latter is not fixed to a particular location, but moves, depending on the individual observations. We describe how to compute this point of minimum error given a covariance matrix and verify the validity of the approach using Monte Carlo simulations on a number of scenarios. Looking at the movement of the point of minimum error, we find that it can be located surprisingly far away from its expected position. This is further validated by an experiment using a real camera system.
KW - H.5.1 [information interfaces and presentation]: Multimedia information systems - Artificial, augmented, and virtual realities
KW - I.4.8 [image processing and computer vision]: Scene analysis - Tracking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651090986&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643548
DO - 10.1109/ISMAR.2010.5643548
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78651090986
SN - 9781424493449
T3 - 9th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2010: Science and Technology, ISMAR 2010 - Proceedings
SP - 37
EP - 45
BT - 9th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2010
T2 - 9th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality 2010: Science and Technology, ISMAR 2010
Y2 - 13 October 2010 through 16 October 2010
ER -