TY - JOUR
T1 - Dark-field chest X-ray imaging for the assessment of COVID-19-pneumonia
AU - Frank, Manuela
AU - Gassert, Florian T.
AU - Urban, Theresa
AU - Willer, Konstantin
AU - Noichl, Wolfgang
AU - Schick, Rafael
AU - Schultheiss, Manuel
AU - Viermetz, Manuel
AU - Gleich, Bernhard
AU - De Marco, Fabio
AU - Herzen, Julia
AU - Koehler, Thomas
AU - Engel, Klaus Jürgen
AU - Renger, Bernhard
AU - Gassert, Felix G.
AU - Sauter, Andreas
AU - Fingerle, Alexander A.
AU - Haller, Bernhard
AU - Makowski, Marcus R.
AU - Pfeiffer, Daniela
AU - Pfeiffer, Franz
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Currently, alternative medical imaging methods for the assessment of pulmonary involvement in patients infected with COVID-19 are sought that combine a higher sensitivity than conventional (attenuation-based) chest radiography with a lower radiation dose than CT imaging. Methods: Sixty patients with COVID-19-associated lung changes in a CT scan and 40 subjects without pathologic lung changes visible in the CT scan were included (in total, 100, 59 male, mean age 58 ± 14 years). All patients gave written informed consent. We employed a clinical setup for grating-based dark-field chest radiography, obtaining both a dark-field and a conventional attenuation image in one image acquisition. Attenuation images alone, dark-field images alone, and both displayed simultaneously were assessed for the presence of COVID-19-associated lung changes on a scale from 1 to 6 (1 = surely not, 6 = surely) by four blinded radiologists. Statistical analysis was performed by evaluation of the area under the receiver–operator-characteristics curves (AUC) using Obuchowski’s method with a 0.05 level of significance. Results: We show that dark-field imaging has a higher sensitivity for COVID-19-pneumonia than attenuation-based imaging and that the combination of both is superior to one imaging modality alone. Furthermore, a quantitative image analysis shows a significant reduction of dark-field signals for COVID-19-patients. Conclusions: Dark-field imaging complements and improves conventional radiography for the visualisation and detection of COVID-19-pneumonia.
AB - Background: Currently, alternative medical imaging methods for the assessment of pulmonary involvement in patients infected with COVID-19 are sought that combine a higher sensitivity than conventional (attenuation-based) chest radiography with a lower radiation dose than CT imaging. Methods: Sixty patients with COVID-19-associated lung changes in a CT scan and 40 subjects without pathologic lung changes visible in the CT scan were included (in total, 100, 59 male, mean age 58 ± 14 years). All patients gave written informed consent. We employed a clinical setup for grating-based dark-field chest radiography, obtaining both a dark-field and a conventional attenuation image in one image acquisition. Attenuation images alone, dark-field images alone, and both displayed simultaneously were assessed for the presence of COVID-19-associated lung changes on a scale from 1 to 6 (1 = surely not, 6 = surely) by four blinded radiologists. Statistical analysis was performed by evaluation of the area under the receiver–operator-characteristics curves (AUC) using Obuchowski’s method with a 0.05 level of significance. Results: We show that dark-field imaging has a higher sensitivity for COVID-19-pneumonia than attenuation-based imaging and that the combination of both is superior to one imaging modality alone. Furthermore, a quantitative image analysis shows a significant reduction of dark-field signals for COVID-19-patients. Conclusions: Dark-field imaging complements and improves conventional radiography for the visualisation and detection of COVID-19-pneumonia.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148517112&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s43856-022-00215-3
DO - 10.1038/s43856-022-00215-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85148517112
SN - 2730-664X
VL - 2
JO - Communications Medicine
JF - Communications Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 147
ER -