Counting of oxygen defects versus metal surface sites in methanol synthesis catalysts by different probe molecules

Matthias B. Fichtl, Julia Schumann, Igor Kasatkin, Nikolas Jacobsen, Malte Behrens, Robert Schlögl, Martin Muhler, Olaf Hinrichsen

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

121 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Different surface sites of solid catalysts are usually quantified by dedicated chemisorption techniques from the adsorption capacity of probe molecules, assuming they specifically react with unique sites. In case of methanol synthesis catalysts, the Cu surface area is one of the crucial parameters in catalyst design and was for over 25 years commonly determined using diluted N2O. To disentangle the influence of the catalyst components, different model catalysts were prepared and characterized using N2O, temperature programmed desorption of H2, and kinetic experiments. The presence of ZnO dramatically influences the N2O measurements. This effect can be explained by the presence of oxygen defect sites that are generated at the Cu-ZnO interface and can be used to easily quantify the intensity of Cu-Zn interaction. N2O in fact probes the Cu surface plus the oxygen vacancies, whereas the exposed Cu surface area can be accurately determined by H2. A combination of N2O reactive frontal chromatography and H2 temperature-programmed desorption is used to analyze the interplay of copper and zinc oxide in methanol synthesis catalysts. This method provides an easy in situ approach to quantify the direct copper-zinc interaction (SMSI effect) and offers an important possibility to rational catalyst design also for other supported metal catalysts.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)7043-7047
Seitenumfang5
FachzeitschriftAngewandte Chemie International Edition in English
Jahrgang53
Ausgabenummer27
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Juli 2014

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Counting of oxygen defects versus metal surface sites in methanol synthesis catalysts by different probe molecules“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren