TY - JOUR
T1 - Coronary microevaginations characterize culprit plaques and their inflammatory microenvironment in a subtype of acute coronary syndrome with intact fibrous cap
T2 - Results from the prospective translational OPTICO-ACS study
AU - Seppelt, Claudio
AU - Abdelwahed, Youssef S.
AU - Meteva, Denitsa
AU - Nelles, Gregor
AU - Stahli, Barbara E.
AU - Erbay, Aslihan
AU - Krankel, Nicolle
AU - Sieronski, Lara
AU - Skurk, Carsten
AU - Haghikia, Arash
AU - Sinning, David
AU - Dreger, Henryk
AU - Knebel, Fabian
AU - Trippel, Tobias D.
AU - Krisper, Maximilian
AU - Gerhardt, Teresa
AU - Rai, Himanshu
AU - Klotsche, Jens
AU - Joner, Michael
AU - Landmesser, Ulf
AU - Leistner, David M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - Aims: Coronary microevaginations (CMEs) represent an outward bulge of coronary plaques and have been introduced as a sign of adverse vascular remodelling following coronary device implantation. However, their role in atherosclerosis and plaque destabilization in the absence of coronary intervention is unknown. This study aimed to investigate CME as a novel feature of plaque vulnerability and to characterize its associated inflammatory cell-vessel-wall interactions. Methods and results: A total of 557 patients from the translational OPTICO-ACS study programme underwent optical coherence tomography imaging of the culprit vessel and simultaneous immunophenotyping of the culprit lesion (CL). Two hundred and fifty-eight CLs had a ruptured fibrous cap (RFC) and one hundred had intact fibrous cap (IFC) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as an underlying pathophysiology. CMEs were significantly more frequent in CL when compared with non-CL (25 vs. 4%, P < 0.001) and were more frequently observed in lesions with IFC-ACS when compared with RFC-ACS (55.0 vs. 12.7%, P < 0.001). CMEs were particularly prevalent in IFC-ACS-causing CLs independent of a coronary bifurcation (IFC-ICB) when compared with IFC-ACS with an association to a coronary bifurcation (IFC-ACB, 65.4 vs. 43.7%, P = 0.030). CME emerged as the strongest independent predictor of IFC-ICB (relative risk 3.36, 95% confidence interval 1.67-6.76, P = 0.001) by multivariable regression analysis. IFC-ICB demonstrated an enrichment of monocytes in both culprit blood analysis (culprit ratio: 1.1 ± 0.2 vs. 0.9 ± 0.2, P = 0.048) and aspirated culprit thrombi (326 ± 162 vs. 96 ± 87 cells/mm2, P = 0.017), while IFC-ACB confirmed the accumulation of CD4+ T cells, as recently described. Conclusion: This study provides novel evidence for a pathophysiological involvement of CME in the development of IFC-ACS and provides first evidence for a distinct pathophysiological pathway for IFC-ICB, driven by CME-derived flow disturbances and inflammatory activation involving the innate immune system. Trial registration: Registration of the study at clinicalTrials.gov (NCT03129503).
AB - Aims: Coronary microevaginations (CMEs) represent an outward bulge of coronary plaques and have been introduced as a sign of adverse vascular remodelling following coronary device implantation. However, their role in atherosclerosis and plaque destabilization in the absence of coronary intervention is unknown. This study aimed to investigate CME as a novel feature of plaque vulnerability and to characterize its associated inflammatory cell-vessel-wall interactions. Methods and results: A total of 557 patients from the translational OPTICO-ACS study programme underwent optical coherence tomography imaging of the culprit vessel and simultaneous immunophenotyping of the culprit lesion (CL). Two hundred and fifty-eight CLs had a ruptured fibrous cap (RFC) and one hundred had intact fibrous cap (IFC) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as an underlying pathophysiology. CMEs were significantly more frequent in CL when compared with non-CL (25 vs. 4%, P < 0.001) and were more frequently observed in lesions with IFC-ACS when compared with RFC-ACS (55.0 vs. 12.7%, P < 0.001). CMEs were particularly prevalent in IFC-ACS-causing CLs independent of a coronary bifurcation (IFC-ICB) when compared with IFC-ACS with an association to a coronary bifurcation (IFC-ACB, 65.4 vs. 43.7%, P = 0.030). CME emerged as the strongest independent predictor of IFC-ICB (relative risk 3.36, 95% confidence interval 1.67-6.76, P = 0.001) by multivariable regression analysis. IFC-ICB demonstrated an enrichment of monocytes in both culprit blood analysis (culprit ratio: 1.1 ± 0.2 vs. 0.9 ± 0.2, P = 0.048) and aspirated culprit thrombi (326 ± 162 vs. 96 ± 87 cells/mm2, P = 0.017), while IFC-ACB confirmed the accumulation of CD4+ T cells, as recently described. Conclusion: This study provides novel evidence for a pathophysiological involvement of CME in the development of IFC-ACS and provides first evidence for a distinct pathophysiological pathway for IFC-ICB, driven by CME-derived flow disturbances and inflammatory activation involving the innate immune system. Trial registration: Registration of the study at clinicalTrials.gov (NCT03129503).
KW - acute coronary syndrome
KW - coronary bifurcation
KW - coronary microevagination
KW - monocytes
KW - plaque erosion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183649574&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ehjci/jead154
DO - 10.1093/ehjci/jead154
M3 - Article
C2 - 37395586
AN - SCOPUS:85183649574
SN - 2047-2404
VL - 25
SP - 175
EP - 184
JO - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 2
ER -