Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Copenhagen consensus statements on workplace health enhancing physical activity programmes

  • Adam B. Evans
  • , Michelle Skov Blagdon
  • , Lynne Boddy
  • , Tina Dalager
  • , Stefano De Dominicis
  • , Charlotte Edwardson
  • , Annika Frahsa
  • , Anna Gerke
  • , Lee Graves
  • , Genevieve N. Healy
  • , Hannah Henderson
  • , Remco Hoekman
  • , Verena Lenneis
  • , Filip Mess
  • , Claudio Nigg
  • , Ailsa Niven
  • , Marie Overbye
  • , Salvador Angosto Sanchez
  • , Louise Fleng Sandal
  • , Jeroen Scheerder
  • Karen Søgaard, Anne Tjønndal, Frank Vandaele, Hanna Vehmas
  • Department of Nutrition
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Liverpool John Moores University
  • Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark
  • Diabetes Research Centre
  • University of Leicester
  • Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine
  • Department of Entrepreneurship
  • Audencia
  • School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences
  • University of Queensland
  • School of Health and Care Sciences
  • University of Lincoln
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Mulier Instituut
  • Department of Medicine and Health Technology
  • Aalborg University
  • Institute of Sport Science
  • University of Bern
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Human Performance and Sport Science
  • University of Murcia
  • Department of Movement Sciences
  • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
  • Department of Organisation
  • Nord University Business School
  • Artevelde University of Applied Sciences
  • Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences
  • University of Jyväskylä

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

Abstract

Workplace health enhancing physical activity (HEPA) programmes are associated with physical activity promotion and reduction of sedentary time among employees. Whilst the workplace is often considered an appropriate setting for such programmes, however, ethical and implementation challenges remain. Furthermore, debate still exists concerning programme rationale, efficacy, effectiveness, and impact. In 2024, 24 researchers from twelve countries collaborated to establish evidence-based consensus statements concerning such programmes. The consensus was developed through an iterative process involving experts from sociology, psychology, sport policy, physiology and promoting and assessing movement behaviours. In total 36 consensus statements and 23 areas identified for further research were produced. A broad definition of HEPA was adopted that included structured and unstructured activities, whilst HEPA was distinguished from occupational and leisure-time activities. Consensus highlighted, for example, the importance of multi-level approaches to programme implementation, the need for managerial support, and the need to tailor programme design. The consensus also demonstrated the need for more research on the long-term impacts of workplace HEPA programmes, to investigate the potential role of technology, and to further understand the influence of socio-cultural and individual factors on participation.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)93-103
Seitenumfang11
FachzeitschriftEuropean Journal for Sport and Society
Jahrgang22
Ausgabenummer2
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2025

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Copenhagen consensus statements on workplace health enhancing physical activity programmes“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren