TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Evaluation of LMR-NCM and NCA Cathode Active Materials in Multilayer Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells
T2 - Part I. Production, Electrode Characterization, and Formation
AU - Schreiner, David
AU - Zünd, Tanja
AU - Günter, Florian J.
AU - Kraft, Ludwig
AU - Stumper, Benedikt
AU - Linsenmann, Fabian
AU - Schüßler, Michael
AU - Wilhelm, Rebecca
AU - Jossen, Andreas
AU - Reinhart, Gunther
AU - Gasteiger, Hubert A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published on behalf of The Electrochemical Society by IOP Publishing Limited.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - A lithium- and manganese-rich layered transition metal oxide (LMR-NCM) cathode active material (CAM) is processed on a pilot production line and assembled with graphite anodes to ≈7 Ah multilayer pouch cells. Each production step is outlined in detail and compared to NCA/graphite reference cells. Using laboratory coin cell data for different CAM loadings and cathode porosities, a simple calculation tool to extrapolate and optimize the energy density of multilayer pouch cells is presented and validated. Scanning electron microscopy and mercury porosimetry measurements of the cathodes elucidate the effect of the CAM morphology on the calendering process and explain the difficulty of achieving commonly used cathode porosities with LMR-NCM cathodes. Since LMR-NCMs exhibit strong gassing during the first cycles, a modified formation procedure based on on-line electrochemical mass spectroscopy is developed that allows stable cycling of LMR-NCM in multilayer pouch cells. After formation and degassing, LMR-NCM/graphite pouch cells have a 30% higher CAM-specific capacity and a ≈5%-10% higher cell-level energy density at a rate of C/10 compared to NCA/graphite cells. Rate capability, long-term cycling, and thermal behavior of the pouch cells in comparison with laboratory coin cells are investigated in Part II of this work.
AB - A lithium- and manganese-rich layered transition metal oxide (LMR-NCM) cathode active material (CAM) is processed on a pilot production line and assembled with graphite anodes to ≈7 Ah multilayer pouch cells. Each production step is outlined in detail and compared to NCA/graphite reference cells. Using laboratory coin cell data for different CAM loadings and cathode porosities, a simple calculation tool to extrapolate and optimize the energy density of multilayer pouch cells is presented and validated. Scanning electron microscopy and mercury porosimetry measurements of the cathodes elucidate the effect of the CAM morphology on the calendering process and explain the difficulty of achieving commonly used cathode porosities with LMR-NCM cathodes. Since LMR-NCMs exhibit strong gassing during the first cycles, a modified formation procedure based on on-line electrochemical mass spectroscopy is developed that allows stable cycling of LMR-NCM in multilayer pouch cells. After formation and degassing, LMR-NCM/graphite pouch cells have a 30% higher CAM-specific capacity and a ≈5%-10% higher cell-level energy density at a rate of C/10 compared to NCA/graphite cells. Rate capability, long-term cycling, and thermal behavior of the pouch cells in comparison with laboratory coin cells are investigated in Part II of this work.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103161150&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1149/1945-7111/abe50c
DO - 10.1149/1945-7111/abe50c
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85103161150
SN - 0013-4651
VL - 168
JO - Journal of the Electrochemical Society
JF - Journal of the Electrochemical Society
IS - 3
M1 - 030507
ER -