TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinically relevant copy-number variants in exome sequencing data of patients with dystonia
AU - Zech, Michael
AU - Boesch, Sylvia
AU - Škorvánek, Matej
AU - Necpál, Ján
AU - Švantnerová, Jana
AU - Wagner, Matias
AU - Dincer, Yasemin
AU - Sadr-Nabavi, Ariane
AU - Serranová, Tereza
AU - Rektorová, Irena
AU - Havránková, Petra
AU - Ganai, Shahzaman
AU - Mosejová, Alexandra
AU - Příhodová, Iva
AU - Šarláková, Jana
AU - Kulcsarová, Kristína
AU - Ulmanová, Olga
AU - Bechyně, Karel
AU - Ostrozovičová, Miriam
AU - Haň, Vladimír
AU - Ventosa, Joaquim Ribeiro
AU - Shariati, Mohammad
AU - Shoeibi, Ali
AU - Weber, Sandrina
AU - Mollenhauer, Brit
AU - Trenkwalder, Claudia
AU - Berutti, Riccardo
AU - Strom, Tim M.
AU - Ceballos-Baumann, Andres
AU - Mall, Volker
AU - Haslinger, Bernhard
AU - Jech, Robert
AU - Winkelmann, Juliane
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Introduction: Next-generation sequencing is now used on a routine basis for molecular testing but studies on copy-number variant (CNV) detection from next-generation sequencing data are underrepresented. Utilizing an existing whole-exome sequencing (WES) dataset, we sought to investigate the contribution of rare CNVs to the genetic causality of dystonia. Methods: The CNV read-depth analysis tool ExomeDepth was applied to the exome sequences of 953 unrelated patients with dystonia (600 with isolated dystonia and 353 with combined dystonia; 33% with additional neurological involvement). We prioritized rare CNVs that affected known disease genes and/or were known to be associated with defined microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. Pathogenicity assessment of CNVs was based on recently published standards of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Clinical Genome Resource. Results: We identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs in 14 of 953 patients (1.5%). Of the 14 different CNVs, 12 were deletions and 2 were duplications, ranging in predicted size from 124bp to 17 Mb. Within the deletion intervals, BRPF1, CHD8, DJ1, EFTUD2, FGF14, GCH1, PANK2, SGCE, UBE3A, VPS16, WARS2, and WDR45 were determined as the most clinically relevant genes. The duplications involved chromosomal regions 6q21-q22 and 15q11-q13. CNV analysis increased the diagnostic yield in the total cohort from 18.4% to 19.8%, as compared to the assessment of single-nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions alone. Conclusions: WES-based CNV analysis in dystonia is feasible, increases the diagnostic yield, and should be combined with the assessment of single-nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions.
AB - Introduction: Next-generation sequencing is now used on a routine basis for molecular testing but studies on copy-number variant (CNV) detection from next-generation sequencing data are underrepresented. Utilizing an existing whole-exome sequencing (WES) dataset, we sought to investigate the contribution of rare CNVs to the genetic causality of dystonia. Methods: The CNV read-depth analysis tool ExomeDepth was applied to the exome sequences of 953 unrelated patients with dystonia (600 with isolated dystonia and 353 with combined dystonia; 33% with additional neurological involvement). We prioritized rare CNVs that affected known disease genes and/or were known to be associated with defined microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. Pathogenicity assessment of CNVs was based on recently published standards of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Clinical Genome Resource. Results: We identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs in 14 of 953 patients (1.5%). Of the 14 different CNVs, 12 were deletions and 2 were duplications, ranging in predicted size from 124bp to 17 Mb. Within the deletion intervals, BRPF1, CHD8, DJ1, EFTUD2, FGF14, GCH1, PANK2, SGCE, UBE3A, VPS16, WARS2, and WDR45 were determined as the most clinically relevant genes. The duplications involved chromosomal regions 6q21-q22 and 15q11-q13. CNV analysis increased the diagnostic yield in the total cohort from 18.4% to 19.8%, as compared to the assessment of single-nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions alone. Conclusions: WES-based CNV analysis in dystonia is feasible, increases the diagnostic yield, and should be combined with the assessment of single-nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions.
KW - Copy-number variant
KW - Diagnostic yield
KW - Dystonia
KW - Read-depth analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100906482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.02.013
DO - 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.02.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 33611074
AN - SCOPUS:85100906482
SN - 1353-8020
VL - 84
SP - 129
EP - 134
JO - Parkinsonism and Related Disorders
JF - Parkinsonism and Related Disorders
ER -