TY - JOUR
T1 - CERAD-NAB and flexible battery based neuropsychological differentiation of Alzheimer’s dementia and depression using machine learning approaches
AU - Dominke, Clara
AU - Fischer, Alina Maria
AU - Grimmer, Timo
AU - Diehl-Schmid, Janine
AU - Jahn, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Depression (DEP) and dementia of the Alzheimer’s type (DAT) represent the most common neuropsychiatric disorders in elderly patients. Accurate differential diagnosis is indispensable to ensure appropriate treatment. However, DEP can yet mimic cognitive symptoms of DAT and patients with DAT often also present with depressive symptoms, impeding correct diagnosis. Machine learning (ML) approaches could eventually improve this discrimination using neuropsychological test data, but evidence is still missing. We therefore employed Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF) and conventional Logistic Regression (LR) to retrospectively predict the diagnoses of 189 elderly patients (68 DEP and 121 DAT) based on either the well-established Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease neuropsychological assessment battery (CERAD-NAB) or a flexible battery approach (FLEXBAT). The best performing combination consisted of FLEXBAT and NB, correctly classifying 87.0% of patients as either DAT or DEP. However, all accuracies were similar across algorithms and test batteries (83.0%–87.0%). Accordingly, our study is the first to show that common ML algorithms with their default parameters can accurately differentiate between patients clinically diagnosed with DAT or DEP using neuropsychological test data, but do not necessarily outperform conventional LR.
AB - Depression (DEP) and dementia of the Alzheimer’s type (DAT) represent the most common neuropsychiatric disorders in elderly patients. Accurate differential diagnosis is indispensable to ensure appropriate treatment. However, DEP can yet mimic cognitive symptoms of DAT and patients with DAT often also present with depressive symptoms, impeding correct diagnosis. Machine learning (ML) approaches could eventually improve this discrimination using neuropsychological test data, but evidence is still missing. We therefore employed Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF) and conventional Logistic Regression (LR) to retrospectively predict the diagnoses of 189 elderly patients (68 DEP and 121 DAT) based on either the well-established Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease neuropsychological assessment battery (CERAD-NAB) or a flexible battery approach (FLEXBAT). The best performing combination consisted of FLEXBAT and NB, correctly classifying 87.0% of patients as either DAT or DEP. However, all accuracies were similar across algorithms and test batteries (83.0%–87.0%). Accordingly, our study is the first to show that common ML algorithms with their default parameters can accurately differentiate between patients clinically diagnosed with DAT or DEP using neuropsychological test data, but do not necessarily outperform conventional LR.
KW - Alzheimer’s dementia
KW - CERAD-NAB
KW - depression
KW - differential diagnosis
KW - flexible battery approach
KW - machine learning
KW - neuropsychological assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141348267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13825585.2022.2138255
DO - 10.1080/13825585.2022.2138255
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85141348267
SN - 1382-5585
VL - 31
SP - 221
EP - 248
JO - Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
JF - Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
IS - 2
ER -