TY - JOUR
T1 - C-arm angle measurement with accelerometer for brachytherapy
T2 - An accuracy study
AU - Wolff, Thomas
AU - Lasso, Andras
AU - Eblenkamp, Markus
AU - Wintermantel, Erich
AU - Fichtinger, Gabor
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This work was supported through the Applied Cancer Research Unit program of Cancer Care Ontario with funds provided by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Gabor Fichtinger was funded as a Cancer Ontario Research Chair. The authors thank Yashar Madjidi for the fabrication of the C-arm calibration phantom.
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - Purpose: X-ray fluoroscopy guidance is frequently used in medical interventions. Image-guided interventional procedures that employ localization for registration require accurate information about the C-arm's rotation angle that provides the data externally in real time. Optical, electromagnetic, and image-based pose tracking systems have limited convenience and accuracy. An alternative method to recover C-arm orientation was developed using an accelerometer as tilt sensor. Methods: The fluoroscopic C-arm's orientation was estimated using a tri-axial acceleration sensor mounted on the X-ray detector as a tilt sensor. When the C-arm is stationary, the measured acceleration direction corresponds to the gravitational force direction. The accelerometer was calibrated with respect to the C-arm's rotation along its two axes, using a high-accuracy optical tracker as a reference. The scaling and offset error of the sensor was compensated using polynomial fitting. The system was evaluated on a GE OEC 9800 C-arm. Results obtained by accelerometer, built-in sensor, and image-based tracking were compared, using optical tracking as ground truth data. Results: The accelerometer-based orientation measurement error for primary angle rotation was - 0.1 ± 0. 0 ° and for secondary angle rotation it was 0.1 ± 0. 0 °. The built-in sensor orientation measurement error for primary angle rotation was - 0.1 ± 0. 2 °, and for secondary angle rotation it was 0.1 ± 0. 2 °. The image-based orientation measurement error for primary angle rotation was - 0.1 ± 1. 3 °, and for secondary angle rotation it was - 1.3 ± 0. 3 °. Conclusion: The accelerometer provided better results than the built-in sensor and image-based tracking. The accelerometer sensor is small, inexpensive, covers the full rotation range of the C-arm, does not require line of sight, and can be easily installed to any mobile X-ray machine. Therefore, accelerometer tilt sensing is a very promising applicant for orientation angle tracking of C-arm fluoroscopes.
AB - Purpose: X-ray fluoroscopy guidance is frequently used in medical interventions. Image-guided interventional procedures that employ localization for registration require accurate information about the C-arm's rotation angle that provides the data externally in real time. Optical, electromagnetic, and image-based pose tracking systems have limited convenience and accuracy. An alternative method to recover C-arm orientation was developed using an accelerometer as tilt sensor. Methods: The fluoroscopic C-arm's orientation was estimated using a tri-axial acceleration sensor mounted on the X-ray detector as a tilt sensor. When the C-arm is stationary, the measured acceleration direction corresponds to the gravitational force direction. The accelerometer was calibrated with respect to the C-arm's rotation along its two axes, using a high-accuracy optical tracker as a reference. The scaling and offset error of the sensor was compensated using polynomial fitting. The system was evaluated on a GE OEC 9800 C-arm. Results obtained by accelerometer, built-in sensor, and image-based tracking were compared, using optical tracking as ground truth data. Results: The accelerometer-based orientation measurement error for primary angle rotation was - 0.1 ± 0. 0 ° and for secondary angle rotation it was 0.1 ± 0. 0 °. The built-in sensor orientation measurement error for primary angle rotation was - 0.1 ± 0. 2 °, and for secondary angle rotation it was 0.1 ± 0. 2 °. The image-based orientation measurement error for primary angle rotation was - 0.1 ± 1. 3 °, and for secondary angle rotation it was - 1.3 ± 0. 3 °. Conclusion: The accelerometer provided better results than the built-in sensor and image-based tracking. The accelerometer sensor is small, inexpensive, covers the full rotation range of the C-arm, does not require line of sight, and can be easily installed to any mobile X-ray machine. Therefore, accelerometer tilt sensing is a very promising applicant for orientation angle tracking of C-arm fluoroscopes.
KW - Accelerometer
KW - Accuracy study
KW - Angle measurement
KW - Brachytherapy
KW - C-arm
KW - Tilt sensor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895066432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11548-013-0918-3
DO - 10.1007/s11548-013-0918-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 23820762
AN - SCOPUS:84895066432
SN - 1861-6410
VL - 9
SP - 137
EP - 144
JO - International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
JF - International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
IS - 1
ER -