TY - JOUR
T1 - BNP as a marker of diastolic dysfunction in the general population
T2 - Importance of left ventricular hypertrophy
AU - Lukowicz, T. V.
AU - Fischer, M.
AU - Hense, H. W.
AU - Döring, A.
AU - Stritzke, J.
AU - Riegger, G.
AU - Schunkert, H.
AU - Luchner, A.
PY - 2005/6
Y1 - 2005/6
N2 - BNP is a marker of systolic left ventricular dysfunction (LVSD) and heart failure. To assess BNP for the detection of diastolic dysfunction in the general population, we examined 1678 subjects within an age- and sex-stratified survey (MONICA Augsburg). BNP was measured using a commercially available RIA (Shionogi). BNP increased in subjects with diastolic dysfunction (mean 20.3±4.7 pg/ml vs. control 9.6±0.5 pg/ml, p<0.001), but to a lesser extent than in subjects with LV hypertrophy (LVH, mean 37.3±49.1 pg/ml, p<0.001 vs. control) or LVSD (mean 76.2±23.2 pg/ml, p<0.001 vs. control). Individuals with sole diastolic abnormality displayed BNP concentrations at the control level (mean 9.7±1.7 pg/ml). In univariate analysis, age, BMI, systolic blood pressure, left atrial size, LV mass index, diastolic dysfunction and EF displayed a significant correlation with BNP (p<0.001). However, LV mass index displaced diastolic dysfunction as a significant predictor of BNP in multivariate analysis. Upon ROC analysis, sensitivity and specificity for the detection of diastolic dysfunction by BNP were only 61% and 55%, respectively. Nevertheless, a normal BNP test virtually excluded the presence of diastolic dysfunction and concomitant LVH (NPV 99.9%). Increased BNP concentrations in subjects with diastolic dysfunction are strongly related to LVH. Population-wide screening for diastolic dysfunction with BNP cannot be recommended although a normal BNP test usually excludes diastolic dysfunction and LV hypertrophy.
AB - BNP is a marker of systolic left ventricular dysfunction (LVSD) and heart failure. To assess BNP for the detection of diastolic dysfunction in the general population, we examined 1678 subjects within an age- and sex-stratified survey (MONICA Augsburg). BNP was measured using a commercially available RIA (Shionogi). BNP increased in subjects with diastolic dysfunction (mean 20.3±4.7 pg/ml vs. control 9.6±0.5 pg/ml, p<0.001), but to a lesser extent than in subjects with LV hypertrophy (LVH, mean 37.3±49.1 pg/ml, p<0.001 vs. control) or LVSD (mean 76.2±23.2 pg/ml, p<0.001 vs. control). Individuals with sole diastolic abnormality displayed BNP concentrations at the control level (mean 9.7±1.7 pg/ml). In univariate analysis, age, BMI, systolic blood pressure, left atrial size, LV mass index, diastolic dysfunction and EF displayed a significant correlation with BNP (p<0.001). However, LV mass index displaced diastolic dysfunction as a significant predictor of BNP in multivariate analysis. Upon ROC analysis, sensitivity and specificity for the detection of diastolic dysfunction by BNP were only 61% and 55%, respectively. Nevertheless, a normal BNP test virtually excluded the presence of diastolic dysfunction and concomitant LVH (NPV 99.9%). Increased BNP concentrations in subjects with diastolic dysfunction are strongly related to LVH. Population-wide screening for diastolic dysfunction with BNP cannot be recommended although a normal BNP test usually excludes diastolic dysfunction and LV hypertrophy.
KW - BNP
KW - Diastolic dysfunction
KW - Echocardiography
KW - Heart failure
KW - LV hypertrophy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19544386427&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.12.010
DO - 10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.12.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 15921790
AN - SCOPUS:19544386427
SN - 1388-9842
VL - 7
SP - 525
EP - 531
JO - European Journal of Heart Failure
JF - European Journal of Heart Failure
IS - 4
ER -