Automatic detection of airborne pollen: an overview

Jeroen Buters; Bernard Clot; Carmen Galán; Regula Gehrig; Stefan Gilge; François Hentges; David O’Connor; Branko Sikoparija; Carsten Skjoth; Fiona Tummon; Beverley Adams-Groom; Célia M. Antunes; Nicolas Bruffaerts; Sevcan Çelenk; Benoit Crouzy; Géraldine Guillaud; Lenka Hajkova; Andreja Kofol Seliger; Gilles Oliver; Helena Ribeiro; Victoria Rodinkova; Annika Saarto; Ingrida Sauliene; Olga Sozinova; Barbara Stjepanovic

doi:10.1007/s10453-022-09750-x

Automatic detection of airborne pollen: an overview

Jeroen Buters, Bernard Clot, Carmen Galán, Regula Gehrig, Stefan Gilge, François Hentges, David O’Connor, Branko Sikoparija, Carsten Skjoth, Fiona Tummon, Beverley Adams-Groom, Célia M. Antunes, Nicolas Bruffaerts, Sevcan Çelenk, Benoit Crouzy, Géraldine Guillaud, Lenka Hajkova, Andreja Kofol Seliger, Gilles Oliver, Helena RibeiroVictoria Rodinkova, Annika Saarto, Ingrida Sauliene, Olga Sozinova, Barbara Stjepanovic

Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Allergologie und Umweltforschung

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Begutachtung

33 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Pollen monitoring has traditionally been carried out using manual methods first developed in the early 1950s. Although this technique has been recently standardised, it suffers from several drawbacks, notably data usually only being available with a delay of 3–9 days and usually delivered at a daily resolution. Several automatic instruments have come on to the market over the past few years, with more new devices also under development. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all available and developing automatic instruments, how they measure, how they identify airborne pollen, what impacts measurement quality, as well as what potential there is for further advancement in the field of bioaerosol monitoring.

Originalsprache	Englisch
Seiten (von - bis)	13-37
Seitenumfang	25
Fachzeitschrift	Aerobiologia
Jahrgang	40
Ausgabenummer	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-022-09750-x
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - März 2024

Zugriff auf Dokument

10.1007/s10453-022-09750-x

Andere Dateien und Links

Verknüpfung zur Publikation in Scopus

Dieses zitieren

Buters, J., Clot, B., Galán, C., Gehrig, R., Gilge, S., Hentges, F., O’Connor, D., Sikoparija, B., Skjoth, C., Tummon, F., Adams-Groom, B., Antunes, C. M., Bruffaerts, N., Çelenk, S., Crouzy, B., Guillaud, G., Hajkova, L., Seliger, A. K., Oliver, G., ... Stjepanovic, B. (2024). Automatic detection of airborne pollen: an overview. Aerobiologia, 40(1), 13-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-022-09750-x

@article{7fdbc4552ec04f798ed57921b2cfe313,

title = "Automatic detection of airborne pollen: an overview",

abstract = "Pollen monitoring has traditionally been carried out using manual methods first developed in the early 1950s. Although this technique has been recently standardised, it suffers from several drawbacks, notably data usually only being available with a delay of 3–9 days and usually delivered at a daily resolution. Several automatic instruments have come on to the market over the past few years, with more new devices also under development. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all available and developing automatic instruments, how they measure, how they identify airborne pollen, what impacts measurement quality, as well as what potential there is for further advancement in the field of bioaerosol monitoring.",

keywords = "Automatic monitor, Fungal spores, Methods, Pollen",

author = "Jeroen Buters and Bernard Clot and Carmen Gal{\'a}n and Regula Gehrig and Stefan Gilge and Fran{\c c}ois Hentges and David O{\textquoteright}Connor and Branko Sikoparija and Carsten Skjoth and Fiona Tummon and Beverley Adams-Groom and Antunes, {C{\'e}lia M.} and Nicolas Bruffaerts and Sevcan {\c C}elenk and Benoit Crouzy and G{\'e}raldine Guillaud and Lenka Hajkova and Seliger, {Andreja Kofol} and Gilles Oliver and Helena Ribeiro and Victoria Rodinkova and Annika Saarto and Ingrida Sauliene and Olga Sozinova and Barbara Stjepanovic",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2022.",

year = "2024",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1007/s10453-022-09750-x",

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "13--37",

journal = "Aerobiologia",

issn = "0393-5965",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",

number = "1",

}

Buters, J, Clot, B, Galán, C, Gehrig, R, Gilge, S, Hentges, F, O’Connor, D, Sikoparija, B, Skjoth, C, Tummon, F, Adams-Groom, B, Antunes, CM, Bruffaerts, N, Çelenk, S, Crouzy, B, Guillaud, G, Hajkova, L, Seliger, AK, Oliver, G, Ribeiro, H, Rodinkova, V, Saarto, A, Sauliene, I, Sozinova, O & Stjepanovic, B 2024, 'Automatic detection of airborne pollen: an overview', Aerobiologia, Jg. 40, Nr. 1, S. 13-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-022-09750-x

TY - JOUR

T1 - Automatic detection of airborne pollen

T2 - an overview

AU - Buters, Jeroen

AU - Clot, Bernard

AU - Galán, Carmen

AU - Gehrig, Regula

AU - Gilge, Stefan

AU - Hentges, François

AU - O’Connor, David

AU - Sikoparija, Branko

AU - Skjoth, Carsten

AU - Tummon, Fiona

AU - Adams-Groom, Beverley

AU - Antunes, Célia M.

AU - Bruffaerts, Nicolas

AU - Çelenk, Sevcan

AU - Crouzy, Benoit

AU - Guillaud, Géraldine

AU - Hajkova, Lenka

AU - Seliger, Andreja Kofol

AU - Oliver, Gilles

AU - Ribeiro, Helena

AU - Rodinkova, Victoria

AU - Saarto, Annika

AU - Sauliene, Ingrida

AU - Sozinova, Olga

AU - Stjepanovic, Barbara

PY - 2024/3

Y1 - 2024/3

N2 - Pollen monitoring has traditionally been carried out using manual methods first developed in the early 1950s. Although this technique has been recently standardised, it suffers from several drawbacks, notably data usually only being available with a delay of 3–9 days and usually delivered at a daily resolution. Several automatic instruments have come on to the market over the past few years, with more new devices also under development. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all available and developing automatic instruments, how they measure, how they identify airborne pollen, what impacts measurement quality, as well as what potential there is for further advancement in the field of bioaerosol monitoring.

AB - Pollen monitoring has traditionally been carried out using manual methods first developed in the early 1950s. Although this technique has been recently standardised, it suffers from several drawbacks, notably data usually only being available with a delay of 3–9 days and usually delivered at a daily resolution. Several automatic instruments have come on to the market over the past few years, with more new devices also under development. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all available and developing automatic instruments, how they measure, how they identify airborne pollen, what impacts measurement quality, as well as what potential there is for further advancement in the field of bioaerosol monitoring.

KW - Automatic monitor

KW - Fungal spores

KW - Methods

KW - Pollen

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135269016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10453-022-09750-x

DO - 10.1007/s10453-022-09750-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85135269016

SN - 0393-5965

VL - 40

SP - 13

EP - 37

JO - Aerobiologia

JF - Aerobiologia

IS - 1

ER -

Automatic detection of airborne pollen: an overview

Abstract

Zugriff auf Dokument

Andere Dateien und Links

Fingerprint

Dieses zitieren