ADULTS’ STRATEGY USE IN COMPLEX FRACTION COMPARISON

Andreas Obersteiner, Vijay Marupudi, Martha W. Alibali

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/KonferenzbandKonferenzbeitragBegutachtung

3 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Several studies have found that when people compare fractions, they show a “natural number bias”, that is, better performance on problems in which the larger fraction has the larger components (e.g., 7/8 vs. 2/3) than on problems in which the larger fraction has the smaller components (e.g., 2/3 vs. 4/9). However, more recent studies found the opposite pattern (“reverse bias”). To better understand what causes these patterns, we investigated adults’ strategies in complex comparison problems with varying affordances. Adults reported strategies on a trial-by-trial basis. Overall, we found a reverse bias pattern. Strategy use varied by problem type, suggesting that participants used strategies adaptively. The study highlights variability in strategy use depending on problem type, which may account for diverse bias patterns in previous studies.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
TitelProceedings of the 43rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2019
Redakteure/-innenMellony Graven, Hamsa Venkat, Anthony A Essien, Pamela Vale
Herausgeber (Verlag)Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME)
Seiten153-160
Seitenumfang8
ISBN (Print)9780639821542
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2019
Extern publiziertJa
Veranstaltung43rd Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME 2019 - Pretoria, Südafrika
Dauer: 7 Juli 201912 Juli 2019

Publikationsreihe

NameProceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
Band3
ISSN (Print)0771-100X
ISSN (elektronisch)2790-3648

Konferenz

Konferenz43rd Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME 2019
Land/GebietSüdafrika
OrtPretoria
Zeitraum7/07/1912/07/19

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „ADULTS’ STRATEGY USE IN COMPLEX FRACTION COMPARISON“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren