Adiposity-related heterogeneity in patterns of type 2 diabetes susceptibility observed in genome-wide association data

  • Nicholas J. Timpson
  • , Cecilia M. Lindgren
  • , Michael N. Weedon
  • , Joshua Randall
  • , Willem H. Ouwehand
  • , David P. Strachan
  • , N. William Rayner
  • , Mark Walker
  • , Graham A. Hitman
  • , Alex S.F. Doney
  • , Colin N.A. Palmer
  • , Andrew D. Morris
  • , Andrew T. Hattersley
  • , Eleftheria Zeggini
  • , Timothy M. Frayling
  • , Mark I. McCarthy

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelBegutachtung

104 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE-This study examined how differences in the BMI distribution of type 2 diabetic case subjects affected genome- wide patterns of type 2 diabetes association and considered the implications for the etiological heterogeneity of type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-We reanalyzed data from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium genome-wide association scan (1,924 case subjects, 2,938 control subjects: 393,453 single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) after stratifying case subjects (into "obese" and "nonobese") according to median BMI (30.2 kg/m2). Replication of signals in which alternative case-ascertainment strategies generated marked effect size heterogeneity in type 2 diabetes association signal was sought in additional samples. RESULTS-In the "obese-type 2 diabetes" scan, FTO variants had the strongest type 2 diabetes effect (rs8050136: relative risk [RR] 1.49 [95% CI 1.34-1.66], P = 1.3 × 10 -13), with only weak evidence for TCF7L2 (rs7901695 RR 1.21 [1.09-1.35], P = 0.001). This situation was reversed in the "nonobese" scan, with FTO association undetectable (RR 1.07 [0.97-1.19], P = 0.19) and TCF7L2 predominant (RR 1.53 [1.37-1.71], P = 1.3 × 10-14). These patterns, confimed by replication, generated strong combined evidence for between-stratum effect size heterogeneity (FTO: PDIFF = 1.4 × 10-7; TCF7L2: PDIFF = 4.0 X 10-6). Other signals displaying evidence of effect size heterogeneity in the genome-wide analyses (on chromosomes 3, 12, 15, and 18) did not replicate. Analysis of the current list of type 2 diabetes susceptibility variants revealed nominal evidence for effect size heterogeneity for the SLC30A8 locus alone (RR obese 1.08 [1.011.15]; RRnonobese 1.18 [1.10-1.27]: PdiFF = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS-This study demonstrates the impact of differences in case ascertainment on the power to detect and replicate genetic associations in genome-wide association studies. These data reinforce the notion that there is substantial etiological heterogeneity within type 2 diabetes.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)505-510
Seitenumfang6
FachzeitschriftDiabetes
Jahrgang58
Ausgabenummer2
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Feb. 2009
Extern publiziertJa

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gute Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Adiposity-related heterogeneity in patterns of type 2 diabetes susceptibility observed in genome-wide association data“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren