TY - JOUR
T1 - Adaptation of protein surfaces to subcellular location
AU - Andrade, Miguel A.
AU - O'Donoghue, Seán I.
AU - Rost, Burkhard
N1 - Funding Information:
For fruitful discussions we are grateful to Michael Nilges, Nigel Brown, and Chris Sander. B.R. thanks Chris Sander and Matti Saraste for financial support. M.A.A. was supported from a fellowship of the European Union TMR programme. Thanks also to all who deposit information in public databases, and to those who carry the burden of maintaining these valuable evolutionary records. Figure 4(a) was inspired by the “letter-plots” of Søren Brunak.
PY - 1998/2/20
Y1 - 1998/2/20
N2 - In vivo, proteins occur in widely different physio-chemical environments, and, from in vitro studies, we know that protein structure can be very sensitive to environment. However, theoretical studies of protein structure have tended to ignore this complexity. In this paper, we have approached this problem by grouping proteins by their subcellular location and looking at structural properties that are characteristic to each location. We hypothesize that, throughout evolution, each subcellular location has maintained a characteristic physio-chemical environment, and that proteins in each location have adapted to these environments. If so, we would expect that protein structures from different locations will show characteristic differences, particularly at the surface, which is directly exposed to the environment. To test this hypothesis, we have examined all eukaryotic proteins with known three-dimensional structure and for which the subcellular location is known to be either nuclear, cytoplasmic, or extracellular. In agreement with previous studies, we find that the total amino acid composition carries a signal that identifies the subcellular location. This signal was due almost entirely to the surface residues. The surface residue signal was often strong enough to accurately predict subcellular location, given only a knowledge of which residues are at the protein surface. The results suggest how the accuracy of prediction of location from sequence can be improved. We concluded that protein surfaces show adaptation to their subcellular location. The nature of these adaptations suggests several principles that proteins may have used in adapting to particular physio-chemical environments; these principles may be useful for protein design.
AB - In vivo, proteins occur in widely different physio-chemical environments, and, from in vitro studies, we know that protein structure can be very sensitive to environment. However, theoretical studies of protein structure have tended to ignore this complexity. In this paper, we have approached this problem by grouping proteins by their subcellular location and looking at structural properties that are characteristic to each location. We hypothesize that, throughout evolution, each subcellular location has maintained a characteristic physio-chemical environment, and that proteins in each location have adapted to these environments. If so, we would expect that protein structures from different locations will show characteristic differences, particularly at the surface, which is directly exposed to the environment. To test this hypothesis, we have examined all eukaryotic proteins with known three-dimensional structure and for which the subcellular location is known to be either nuclear, cytoplasmic, or extracellular. In agreement with previous studies, we find that the total amino acid composition carries a signal that identifies the subcellular location. This signal was due almost entirely to the surface residues. The surface residue signal was often strong enough to accurately predict subcellular location, given only a knowledge of which residues are at the protein surface. The results suggest how the accuracy of prediction of location from sequence can be improved. We concluded that protein surfaces show adaptation to their subcellular location. The nature of these adaptations suggests several principles that proteins may have used in adapting to particular physio-chemical environments; these principles may be useful for protein design.
KW - Bioinformatics
KW - Protein evolution
KW - Protein surface
KW - Protein three-dimensional-structure
KW - Subcellular location
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0032548904
U2 - 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1498
DO - 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1498
M3 - Article
C2 - 9512720
AN - SCOPUS:0032548904
SN - 0022-2836
VL - 276
SP - 517
EP - 525
JO - Journal of Molecular Biology
JF - Journal of Molecular Biology
IS - 2
ER -