TY - JOUR
T1 - Accelerometer-Based Quantification of 6-Minute Walk Test Performance in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
T2 - Applicability in Telemedicine
AU - Jehn, Melissa
AU - Schmidt-Trucksäess, Arno
AU - Schuster, Tibor
AU - Hanssen, Henner
AU - Weis, Michael
AU - Halle, Martin
AU - Koehler, Friedrich
PY - 2009/5
Y1 - 2009/5
N2 - Background: Distance walked in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is an important prognostic parameter used clinically to assess functional status in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). In this study, we investigated if alternative performance parameters with similar prognostic value can be gained from accelerometers. Methods and Results: Fifty CHF patients (age, 60.9 ± 14.0 years) were asked to perform a 6MWT while wearing 2 accelerometers and 1 pedometer. Total 6MWT step frequency (SF) and activity counts (VMU) were correlated to 6MWT distance. The accelerometer was highly accurate at quantifying SF (detected vs. observed: r = 0.99; P < .001), whereas the pedometer was unreliable below 50 m/min. VMU increased linearly with walking speed (r = 0.99), and both SF and VMU correlated strongly with 6MWT distance (VMU: r = 0.91; SF: r = 0.87, respectively; P < .001) and each other (r = 0.80, P < .001). Conclusions: Accelerometers are reliable in measuring physical performance during the 6MWT in CHF patients. Besides the simple acquisition of 6MWT distance currently used for patient assessment, accelerometers provide new data that might be useful to evaluate exercise performance during the 6MWT. This allows for routine assessment of exercise capacity in a home-based setting in the context of telemedicine.
AB - Background: Distance walked in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is an important prognostic parameter used clinically to assess functional status in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). In this study, we investigated if alternative performance parameters with similar prognostic value can be gained from accelerometers. Methods and Results: Fifty CHF patients (age, 60.9 ± 14.0 years) were asked to perform a 6MWT while wearing 2 accelerometers and 1 pedometer. Total 6MWT step frequency (SF) and activity counts (VMU) were correlated to 6MWT distance. The accelerometer was highly accurate at quantifying SF (detected vs. observed: r = 0.99; P < .001), whereas the pedometer was unreliable below 50 m/min. VMU increased linearly with walking speed (r = 0.99), and both SF and VMU correlated strongly with 6MWT distance (VMU: r = 0.91; SF: r = 0.87, respectively; P < .001) and each other (r = 0.80, P < .001). Conclusions: Accelerometers are reliable in measuring physical performance during the 6MWT in CHF patients. Besides the simple acquisition of 6MWT distance currently used for patient assessment, accelerometers provide new data that might be useful to evaluate exercise performance during the 6MWT. This allows for routine assessment of exercise capacity in a home-based setting in the context of telemedicine.
KW - 6-minute walk test
KW - Activity monitoring
KW - RT3
KW - step frequency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65249133435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.11.011
DO - 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.11.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 19398082
AN - SCOPUS:65249133435
SN - 1071-9164
VL - 15
SP - 334
EP - 340
JO - Journal of Cardiac Failure
JF - Journal of Cardiac Failure
IS - 4
ER -